The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved laser ablation U‐Pb zircon geochronology through robust downhole fractionation correction
Abstract
Elemental fractionation effects during analysis are the most significant impediment to obtaining precise and accurate U‐Pb ages by laser ablation ICPMS. Several methods have been proposed to minimize the degree of downhole fractionation, typically by rastering or limiting acquisition to relatively short intervals of time, but these compromise minimum target size or the temporal resolution of data. Alternatively, other methods have been developed which attempt to correct for the effects of downhole elemental fractionation. A common feature of all these techniques, however, is that they impose an expected model of elemental fractionation behavior; thus, any variance in actual fractionation response between laboratories, mineral types, or matrix types cannot be easily accommodated. Here we investigate an alternate approach that aims to reverse the problem by first observing the elemental fractionation response and then applying an appropriate (and often unique) model to the data. This approach has the versatility to treat data from any laboratory, regardless of the expression of downhole fractionation under any given set of analytical conditions. We demonstrate that the use of more complex models of elemental fractionation such as exponential curves and smoothed cubic splines can efficiently correct complex fractionation trends, allowing detection of spatial heterogeneities, while simultaneously maintaining data quality. We present a data reduction module for use with the Iolite software package that implements this methodology and which may provide the means for simpler interlaboratory comparisons and, perhaps most importantly, enable the rapid reduction of large quantities of data with maximum feedback to the user at each stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Melchin, M. J., Mitchell, C. E., Holmden, C., & Storch, P. (2013) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30812.1 · Cited by 331
Earth’s oldest stable crust in the Pilbara Craton formed by cyclic gravitational overturns
Wiemer, D., Schrank, C. E., Murphy, D. T., Wenham, L., & Allen, C. M. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0105-9 · Cited by 124
RNA oligomerization in laboratory analogues of alkaline hydrothermal vent systems
Burcar, B. T., Barge, L. M., Trail, D., Watson, E. B., Russell, M. J., & McGown, L. B. (2015) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2014.1280 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Paton, C., Woodhead, J. D., Hellstrom, J. C., Hergt, J. M., Greig, A., & Maas, R.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1888997480
- Cited by
- 1,486
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved laser ablation U‐Pb zircon geochronology through robust downhole fractionation correction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009gc002618
- The paper
- Paton, C., Woodhead, J. D., Hellstrom, J. C., Hergt, J. M., Greig, A., & Maas, R. (2010). Improved laser ablation U‐Pb zircon geochronology through robust downhole fractionation correction. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gc002618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.