Cited by 73Landslides and related hazardsCryospheric studies and observationsTree Root and Stability Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measurement of crack‐face friction in collapsed weak snow layers

Open access
van Herwijnen, A., Heierli, J.·2009·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

In this letter we analyze the frictional contact forces during and immediately after the collapse of a weak snowpack layer, when the sliding plane consists of the freshly collapsed and crushed, but not yet eroded granular debris of the weak layer. The results from thirty‐four field experiments show that frictional contact forces per unit area are on the order of 0.6 times the normal stress, equivalent to a friction angle close to 30 degrees. The measurements show that there is a transient, sharp drop in the coefficient of friction during the collapse of the weak layer and relatively constant values afterwards. One implication of our findings is that the minimum angle for avalanche release does not depend on shear strength, as commonly thought, but results from crack‐face friction which comes into play only as the fracture through the weak layer is already propagating.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2009gl040389

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buried crystals of depth hoar reported on the site tend to exhibit rather low friction values.

    “the buried crystals of depth hoar, which were reported by the investigation on the site (see Supplementary Note 3), tend to exhibit rather low friction values 13”

    From Mechanisms of slab avalanche release and impact in the Dyatlov Pass incident in 1959 (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion and Conclusion (§4, paragraph 16; page unavailable) says crack-face friction in collapsed weak layers is far from negligible and that the measured friction showed no dependence on weak-layer grain type. The Results (§3, paragraph 14) describe depth hoar as porous and low in cohesion, not low in friction. The paper therefore does not support singling out depth-hoar crystals as tending to have low friction. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.3189/S0260305500007618 · DOI
  2. 10.1063/1.348469 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.08.003 · DOI
  4. 10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 · DOI
  5. 10.1130/0091-7613(1981)9<419:AMFPSS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.005 · DOI
  7. 10.1029/2008GL034245 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1153948 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S0022143000016567 · DOI
  10. Johnson B. andB.Jamieson(2001) Field data and theory for human‐triggered “whumpfs” and remote avalanches paper presented atthe 2000 International Snow Science Workshop Am. Avalanche Assoc. Big Sky Mont.
  11. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2004.05.003 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.027103 · DOI
  13. 10.5194/nhess-2-157-2002 · DOI
  14. 10.1029/JB084iB07p03519 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0165-232X(01)00039-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00665743 · DOI
  17. 10.1029/2002RG000123 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2005.05.005 · DOI
  19. van Herwijnen A. J.Heierli andJ.Schweizer(2008) Field study on fracture propagation in weak snowpack layers paper presented atthe 2008 International Snow Science Workshop Am. Avalanche Assoc. Whistler B. C. Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van Herwijnen, A., & Heierli, J.
Affiliations
  • WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF (CH)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2009-12
Volume
36
Issue
23
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2023348588
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Calgary
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Tree Root and Stability Studies
Keywords
crack face friction, weak snow layers, friction coefficient, internal friction angle, avalanche release, shear strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review