The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thinning and volume loss of the Arctic Ocean sea ice cover: 2003–2008
Abstract
We present our best estimate of the thickness and volume of the Arctic Ocean ice cover from 10 Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) campaigns that span a 5‐year period between 2003 and 2008. Derived ice drafts are consistently within 0.5 m of those from a submarine cruise in mid‐November of 2005 and 4 years of ice draft profiles from moorings in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. Along with a more than 42% decrease in multiyear (MY) ice coverage since 2005, there was a remarkable thinning of ∼0.6 m in MY ice thickness over 4 years. In contrast, the average thickness of the seasonal ice in midwinter (∼2 m), which covered more than two‐thirds of the Arctic Ocean in 2007, exhibited a negligible trend. Average winter sea ice volume over the period, weighted by a loss of ∼3000 km 3 between 2007 and 2008, was ∼14,000 km 3. The total MY ice volume in the winter has experienced a net loss of 6300 km 3 (>40%) in the 4 years since 2005, while the first‐year ice cover gained volume owing to increased overall area coverage. The overall decline in volume and thickness are explained almost entirely by changes in the MY ice cover. Combined with a large decline in MY ice coverage over this short record, there is a reversal in the volumetric and areal contributions of the two ice types to the total volume and area of the Arctic Ocean ice cover. Seasonal ice, having surpassed that of MY ice in winter area coverage and volume, became the dominant ice type. It seems that the near‐zero replenishment of the MY ice cover after the summers of 2005 and 2007, an imbalance in the cycle of replenishment and ice export, has played a significant role in the loss of Arctic sea ice volume over the ICESat record.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anomalous collapses of Nares Strait ice arches leads to enhanced export of Arctic sea ice
Moore, G. W. K., Howell, S. E. L., Brady, M., Xu, X., & McNeil, K. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20314-w · Cited by 5,155
Markus, T., Neumann, T., Martino, A., Abdalati, W., Brunt, K., Csatho, B., Farrell, S., Fricker, H., Gardner, A., Harding, D., et al. (2017) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029 · Cited by 1,215
Self-citationLarge-scale atmospheric circulation changes are associated with the recent loss of Arctic sea ice
Overland, J. E., & Wang, M. (2010) · Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2009.00421.x · Cited by 594
A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data
Ricker, R., Hendricks, S., Kaleschke, L., Tian-Kunze, X., King, J., & Haas, C. (2017) · The Cryosphere · doi:10.5194/tc-11-1607-2017 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., Wensnahan, M., Rigor, I., Zwally, H. J., & Yi, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- C7
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069445353
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinning and volume loss of the Arctic Ocean sea ice cover: 2003–2008. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009jc005312
- The paper
- Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., Wensnahan, M., Rigor, I., Zwally, H. J., & Yi, D. (2009). Thinning and volume loss of the Arctic Ocean sea ice cover: 2003–2008. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jc005312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.