Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory

Open access
McMeeking, Gavin R., Kreidenweis, Sonia M., Baker, Stephen, Carrico, Christian M., Chow, Judith C., Collett, Jeffrey L., Hao, Wei Min, Holden, Amanda S., Kirchstetter, Thomas W., Malm, William C., Moosmüller, Hans, Sullivan, Amy P., Wold, Cyle E.·2009·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We characterized the gas‐ and speciated aerosol‐phase emissions from the open combustion of 33 different plant species during a series of 255 controlled laboratory burns during the Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME). The plant species we tested were chosen to improve the existing database for U.S. domestic fuels: laboratory‐based emission factors have not previously been reported for many commonly burned species that are frequently consumed by fires near populated regions and protected scenic areas. The plants we tested included the chaparral species chamise, manzanita, and ceanothus, and species common to the southeastern United States (common reed, hickory, kudzu, needlegrass rush, rhododendron, cord grass, sawgrass, titi, and wax myrtle). Fire‐integrated emission factors for gas‐phase CO 2, CO, CH 4, C 2–4 hydrocarbons, NH 3, SO 2, NO, NO 2, HNO 3, and particle‐phase organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), SO 42−, NO 3−, Cl−, Na+, K+, and NH 4+generally varied with both fuel type and with the fire‐integrated modified combustion efficiency (MCE), a measure of the relative importance of flaming‐ and smoldering‐phase combustion to the total emissions during the burn. Chaparral fuels tended to emit less particulate OC per unit mass of dry fuel than did other fuel types, whereas southeastern species had some of the largest observed emission factors for total fine particulate matter. Our measurements spanned a larger range of MCE than prior studies, and thus help to improve estimates of the variation of emissions with combustion conditions for individual fuels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2009jd011836

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
McMeeking, G. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., Baker, S., Carrico, C. M., Chow, J. C., Collett, J. L., Hao, W. M., Holden, A. S., Kirchstetter, T. W., Malm, W. C., Moosmüller, H., Sullivan, A. P., & Wold, C. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2009-10-14
Volume
114
Issue
D19
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028018078
Cited by
445
References
1
FWCI
14.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009jd011836
The paper
McMeeking, G. R., Kreidenweis, S. M., Baker, S., Carrico, C. M., Chow, J. C., Collett, J. L., Hao, W. M., Holden, A. S., Kirchstetter, T. W., Malm, W. C., Moosmüller, H., Sullivan, A. P., & Wold, C. E. (2009). Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011836

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.