The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance of high‐resolution satellite precipitation products over China
Open accessAbstract
A gauge‐based analysis of hourly precipitation is constructed on a 0.25° latitude/longitude grid over China for a 3 year period from 2005 to 2007 by interpolating gauge reports from ∼2000 stations collected and quality controlled by the National Meteorological Information Center of the China Meteorological Administration. Gauge‐based precipitation analysis is applied to examine the performance of six high‐resolution satellite precipitation estimates, including Joyce et al.'s (2004) Climate Prediction Center Morphing Technique (CMORPH) and the arithmetic mean of the microwave estimates used in CMORPH; Huffman et al.'s (2007) Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation product 3B42 and its real‐time version 3B42RT; Turk et al.'s (2004) Naval Research Laboratory blended product; and Hsu et al.'s (1997) Precipitation Estimation From Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Network (PERSIANN). Our results showed the following: (1) all six satellite products are capable of capturing the overall spatial distribution and temporal variations of precipitation reasonably well; (2) performance of the satellite products varies for different regions and different precipitation regimes, with better comparison statistics observed over wet regions and for warm seasons; (3) products based solely on satellite observations present regionally and seasonally varying biases, while the gauge‐adjustment procedures applied in TRMM 3B42 remove the large‐scale bias almost completely; (4) CMORPH exhibits the best performance in depicting the spatial pattern and temporal variations of precipitation; and (5) both the relative magnitude and the phase of the warm season precipitation over China are estimated quite well, but the early morning peak associated with the Mei‐Yu rainfall over central eastern China is substantially under‐estimated by all satellite products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Precipitation Characteristics in Eighteen Coupled Climate Models
Dai, A. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3884.1 · Cited by 1,098
Cited by
The hydrology of the humid tropics
Wohl, E., Barros, A., Brunsell, N., Chappell, N. A., Coe, M., Giambelluca, T., Goldsmith, S., Harmon, R., Hendrickx, J. M. H., Juvik, J., et al. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1556 · Cited by 353
Evaluation of satellite-retrieved extreme precipitation rates across the central United States
AghaKouchak, A., Behrangi, A., Sorooshian, S., Hsu, K., & Amitai, E. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2010jd014741 · Cited by 323
Gridded Ensemble Precipitation and Temperature Estimates for the Contiguous United States
Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Craig, J., Nijssen, B., Wood, A., Gutmann, E., Mizukami, N., Brekke, L., & Arnold, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-15-0026.1 · Cited by 184
Zhong, L., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Yang, J., & Zou, F. (2016) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.12.016 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, Y., Xiong, A., Wang, Y., & Xie, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-01-27
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- D2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062698821
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of high‐resolution satellite precipitation products over China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009jd012097
- The paper
- Shen, Y., Xiong, A., Wang, Y., & Xie, P. (2010). Performance of high‐resolution satellite precipitation products over China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.