Surface temperature lapse rates over complex terrain: Lessons from the Cascade Mountains
Abstract
The typically sparse distribution of weather stations in mountainous terrain inadequately resolves temperature variability. Accordingly, high‐resolution gridding of climate data (for applications such as hydrological modeling) often relies on assumptions such as a constant surface temperature lapse rate (i.e., decrease of surface temperature with altitude) of 6.5°C km −1 . Using an example of the Cascade Mountains, we describe the temporal and spatial variability of the surface temperature lapse rate, combining data from: (1) COOP stations, (2) nearby radiosonde launches, (3) a temporary dense network of sensors, (4) forecasts from the MM5 regional model, and (5) PRISM geo‐statistical analyses. On the windward side of the range, the various data sources reveal annual mean lapse rates of 3.9–5.2°C km −1 , substantially smaller than the often‐assumed 6.5°C km −1 . The data sets show similar seasonal and diurnal variability, with lapse rates smallest (2.5–3.5°C km −1 ) in late‐summer minimum temperatures, and largest (6.5–7.5°C km −1 ) in spring maximum temperatures. Geographic (windward versus lee side) differences in lapse rates are found to be substantial. Using a simple runoff model, we show the appreciable implications of these results for hydrological modeling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TLR shows notable spatiotemporal variations.
“TLR shows notable spatiotemporal variations (Minder et al., 2010), and estimating TLR based on ground observations over a large domain is difficult due to the sparsity of stations.”
From SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018 (2020) · cites this paper as Minder et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elevation alters ecosystem properties across temperate treelines globally
Mayor, J. R., Sanders, N. J., Classen, A. T., Bardgett, R. D., Clément, J.-C., Fajardo, A., Lavorel, S., Sundqvist, M. K., Bahn, M., Chisholm, C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21027 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Sha, Y., Gagne II, D. J., West, G., & Stull, R. (2020) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/jamc-d-20-0057.1 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Newman, A. J., Wood, A. W., Papalexiou, S. M., Vionnet, V., & Whitfield, P. H. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-2381-2020 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Dunbar-Irwin, M., & Safford, H. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.039 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Minder, J. R., Mote, P. W., & Lundquist, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-07-27
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- D14
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066737612
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Keywords
- complex terrain, Cascade Range, mountain climate, seasonal and diurnal variation, hydrological modeling, streamflow simulation, PRISM, radiosonde, meteorological station network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review