Cited by 467Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsClimate variability and modelsPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis

Surface temperature lapse rates over complex terrain: Lessons from the Cascade Mountains

Minder, Justin R., Mote, Philip W., Lundquist, Jessica D.·2010·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The typically sparse distribution of weather stations in mountainous terrain inadequately resolves temperature variability. Accordingly, high‐resolution gridding of climate data (for applications such as hydrological modeling) often relies on assumptions such as a constant surface temperature lapse rate (i.e., decrease of surface temperature with altitude) of 6.5°C km −1 . Using an example of the Cascade Mountains, we describe the temporal and spatial variability of the surface temperature lapse rate, combining data from: (1) COOP stations, (2) nearby radiosonde launches, (3) a temporary dense network of sensors, (4) forecasts from the MM5 regional model, and (5) PRISM geo‐statistical analyses. On the windward side of the range, the various data sources reveal annual mean lapse rates of 3.9–5.2°C km −1 , substantially smaller than the often‐assumed 6.5°C km −1 . The data sets show similar seasonal and diurnal variability, with lapse rates smallest (2.5–3.5°C km −1 ) in late‐summer minimum temperatures, and largest (6.5–7.5°C km −1 ) in spring maximum temperatures. Geographic (windward versus lee side) differences in lapse rates are found to be substantial. Using a simple runoff model, we show the appreciable implications of these results for hydrological modeling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2009jd013493

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minder, J. R., Mote, P. W., & Lundquist, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2010-07-27
Volume
115
Issue
D14
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066737612
Cited by
467
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Keywords
complex terrain, Cascade Range, mountain climate, seasonal and diurnal variation, hydrological modeling, streamflow simulation, PRISM, radiosonde, meteorological station network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review