Wet Chemistry experiments on the 2007 Phoenix Mars Scout Lander mission: Data analysis and results
Abstract
Chemical analyses of three Martian soil samples were performed using the Wet Chemistry Laboratories on the 2007 Phoenix Mars Scout Lander. One soil sample was obtained from the top ∼2 cm (Rosy Red) and two were obtained at ∼5 cm depth from the ice table interface (Sorceress 1 and Sorceress 2). When mixed with water in a ∼1:25 soil to solution ratio (by volume), a portion of the soil components solvated. Ion concentrations were measured using an array of ion selective electrodes and solution conductivity using a conductivity cell. The measured concentrations represent the minimum leachable ions in the soil and do not take into account species remaining in the soil. Described is the data processing and analysis for determining concentrations of seven ionic species directly measured in the soil/solution mixture. There were no significant differences in concentrations, pH, or conductivity, between the three samples. Using laboratory experiments, refinement of the surface calibrations, and modeling, we have determined a pH for the soil solution of 7.7(±0.3), under prevalent conditions, carbonate buffering, and PCO2 in the cell headspace. Perchlorate was the dominant anion in solution with a concentration for Rosy Red of 2.7(±1) mM. Equilibrium modeling indicates that measured [Ca 2+] at 0.56(±0.5) mM and [Mg 2+] at 2.9(±1.5) mM, are consistent with carbonate equilibrium for a saturated solution. The [Na+] and [K+] were 1.4(±0.6), and 0.36(±0.3) mM, respectively. Results indicate that the leached portion of soils at the Phoenix landing site are slightly alkaline and dominated by carbonate and perchlorate. However, it should be noted that there is a 5–15 mM discrepancy between measured ions and conductivity and another species may be present.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leaching would ameliorate some of the high EC values reported at Gale Crater by the Phoenix Mars Lander WCL.
“Alternatively, leaching would ameliorate some of the high EC values reported at Gale Crater by the Phoenix Mars Lander WCL (Kounaves et al., 2010).”
From Simple and effective remediation strategies of Martian perchlorates (2026) · cites this paper as Kounaves et al., 2010
Cites
Detection of perchlorate and the soluble chemistry of martian soil at the phoenix lander site
Hecht, M. H., Kounaves, S. P., Quinn, R. C., West, S. J., Young, S. M. M., Ming, D. W., Catling, D. C., Clark, B. C., Boynton, W. V., Hoffman, J., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172466 · Cited by 1,166 · see citing works
Self-citationChemical divides and evaporite assemblages on Mars
Tosca, N. J., & McLennan, S. M. (2006) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.10.021 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Catling, D. C. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/1998je001020 · Cited by 148 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Evaporite sequence models have also suggested an early deposition of carbonates [Catling, 1999; King et al., 2004].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Orbital evidence for more widespread carbonate-bearing rocks on Mars
Wray, J. J., Murchie, S. L., Bishop, J. L., Ehlmann, B. L., Milliken, R. E., Wilhelm, M. B., Seelos, K. D., & Chojnacki, M. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/2015je004972 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Simple and effective remediation strategies of Martian perchlorates
Coker, H. R., Denvir, A. C., & Howe, J. A. (2026) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.1002/saj2.70201 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kounaves, S. P., Hecht, M. H., Kapit, J., Gospodinova, K., DeFlores, L., Quinn, R. C., Boynton, W. V., Clark, B. C., Catling, D. C., Hredzak, P., Ming, D. W., Moore, Q., Shusterman, J., Stroble, S., West, S. J., & Young, S. M. M.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Space Science Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Johnson Space Center (US)
- Invensys Process Systems Foxboro Massachusetts USA
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- E1
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966386117
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Keywords
- Phoenix Mars Lander, Martian soil, wet chemistry, perchlorate, carbonate buffering, soil pH, ion-selective electrodes, conductivity, calcium and magnesium, sodium and potassium, equilibrium modeling, sorceress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review