The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vegetation‐infiltration relationships across climatic and soil type gradients
Open accessAbstract
The enhancement of infiltration capacity in the presence of vegetation is well documented in arid ecosystems where it can significantly impact the water balance and vegetation spatial organization. To begin progress toward developing a theory of vegetation‐infiltration interactions across a wide spectrum of climate regimes, three key questions are addressed: (1) Does vegetation also enhance infiltration capacity in mesic to hydric climates, and if so, what processes contribute to this enhancement? (2) Is there a canonical relationship between vegetation biomass and infiltration rate? and (3) How does the vegetation‐infiltration feedback evolve across climatic gradients? To address these three questions, new field data examining biomass‐infiltration relationships in different vegetation types in a humid climate and on loamy soils are combined with a meta‐analysis of biomass‐infiltration relationships from nearly 50 vegetation communities spanning a climatic gradient from hyperarid deserts to the humid tropics and representing a full spectrum of soil types. Infiltration capacity increased as a power law function of aboveground biomass in water‐limited ecosystems, but vegetation biomass was not significantly correlated to infiltration capacity in humid climates. Across a climatic gradient from xeric to hydric, the slope of the power law relationship between aboveground biomass and infiltration capacity decreased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bosch, J. M., & Hewlett, J. D. (1982) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2 · Cited by 2,567
Cited by
Influence of soil, land use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil
Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., Messing, I., Moeys, J., & Lindahl, A. (2013) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-5185-2013 · Cited by 285
Soil structure is an important omission in Earth System Models
Fatichi, S., Or, D., Walko, R., Vereecken, H., Young, M. H., Ghezzehei, T. A., Hengl, T., Kollet, S., Agam, N., & Avissar, R. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14411-z · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, S. E., Harman, C. J., Heine, P., & Katul, G. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- G2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071149870
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vegetation‐infiltration relationships across climatic and soil type gradients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2009jg001134
- The paper
- Thompson, S. E., Harman, C. J., Heine, P., & Katul, G. G. (2010). Vegetation‐infiltration relationships across climatic and soil type gradients. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jg001134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.