The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mount St. Helens: A 30‐Year Legacy of Volcanism
Abstract
The spectacular eruption of Mount St. Helens on 18 May 1980 electrified scientists and the public. Photodocumentation of the colossal landslide, directed blast, and ensuing eruption column—which reached as high as 25 kilometers in altitude and lasted for nearly 9 hours—made news worldwide. Reconnaissance of the devastation spurred efforts to understand the power and awe of those moments (Figure 1). The eruption remains a seminal historical event—studying it and its aftermath revolutionized the way scientists approach the field of volcanology. Not only was the eruption spectacular, but also it occurred in daytime, at an accessible volcano, in a country with the resources to transform disaster into scientific opportunity, amid a transformation in digital technology. Lives lost and the impact of the eruption on people and infrastructure downstream and downwind made it imperative for scientists to investigate events and work with communities to lessen losses from future eruptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Scientists learned to adjust hazard messaging to the audience, where public messaging must include the societal relevance of hazards and must be specific enough to be actionable by at-risk communities (Tilling 2000;Vallance et al. 2010;Driedger et al. 2020b;Newhall et al. 2021;Uhrich et al. 2021).”
From Development of a volcanic risk management system at Mount St. Helens—1980 to present (2023) · cites this paper as Vallance et al. 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1007/BF00306547 · DOI
- Clynne M. A. Ramsey D. W. andWolfe E. W. (2005) Pre‐eruptive history of Mount St. Helens Washington U.S. Geol. Surv. Fact Sheet 20053045 4 pp. · DOI
- International Civil Aviation Organization, 2001, Manual on volcanic ash, radioactive material and toxic chemical clouds
- 10.1038/nature05322 · DOI
- Lipman P. W. andMullineaux D. R.(Eds.) (1981) The 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens Washington U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1250 844 pp. · DOI
- Malone S. D., 1981, The 1980 Eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington, 803
- McGee K. A. andCasadevall T. J. (1994) A compilation of sulfur dioxide and carbon‐dioxide emission‐rate data from Mount St. Helens during 1980–1988 U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep 94212 24 pp. · DOI
- Miller C. D., 1981, The 1980 Eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington, 789
- 10.1126/science.288.5469.1181 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/93JB01613 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-74379-5_1 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.221.4618.1369 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Development of a volcanic risk management system at Mount St. Helens—1980 to present
Wright, H. M. N., Driedger, C. L., Pallister, J. S., Newhall, C. G., Clynne, M. A., & Ewert, J. W. (2023) · Bulletin of Volcanology · doi:10.1007/s00445-023-01663-y · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallance, J. W., Gardner, C. A., Scott, W. E., Iverson, R. M., & Pierson, T. C.
- Venue
- Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2010-05-11
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 169-170
- ISSN
- 0096-3941
- 2324-9250
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
