Cited by 65Ecosystem dynamics and resiliencePlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsClimate variability and models

Climate change and thresholds of biome shifts in Amazonia

Salazar, Luis Fernando, Nobre, Carlos A.·2010·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

We examine potential critical thresholds for biome shift in the Amazonian tropical forest by forcing a potential vegetation model with prescribed climate anomalies and projections from global and regional climate models and different levels of CO 2 fertilization effect under the SRES A2 scenario (2070–2099). The results indicate that tropical forests might be replaced by seasonal forests or savanna over eastern Amazonia with temperature increases of 2–3°C (4–5°C), when CO 2 fertilization effect is not considered (partially considered), depending on precipitation anomaly. A precipitation decrease greater than 30% would trigger the shift from tropical forest to drier biomes, such as savanna and shrubland in southeastern Amazonia. The projected decrease in precipitation during the dry season and the increase of temperature are the main mechanisms driving calculated biome changes. However, biome changes are considerably smaller when the optimum fertilization effect is included.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2010gl043538

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few global climate models indicate a broad range for a potential critical threshold in global warming between 2 and 6 °C.

    “Nonetheless, a few global climate models3,14,71–74 indicate a broad range for a potential critical threshold in global warming between 2 and 6 °C (Fig. 3a).”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [72]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salazar, L. F., & Nobre, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Industrial de Santander (CO)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2010-09
Volume
37
Issue
17
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1654688399
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
climate change, biome shifts, critical threshold, savanna expansion, seasonal forest, CO2 fertilization, precipitation decrease, temperature rise, SRES A2 scenario, Eastern Amazon, dry season rainfall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review