The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microphysical and macrophysical responses of marine stratocumulus polluted by underlying ships: Evidence of cloud deepening
Open accessAbstract
[1] Ship tracks observed by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) were analyzed to determine the extent to which aerosol plumes from ships passing below marine stratocumulus alter the microphysical and macrophysical properties of the clouds. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery was used to distinguish ship tracks embedded in closed, open, and undefined mesoscale cellular cloud structures. The impact of aerosol on the microphysical cloud properties in both the closed and open cell regimes were consistent with the changes predicted by the Twomey hypothesis. For the macrophysical changes, differences were observed between regimes. In the open cell regime, polluted clouds had significantly higher cloud tops (16%) and more liquid water (39%) than nearby unpolluted clouds. However, in the closed cell regime, polluted clouds exhibited no change in cloud top height and had less liquid water (−6%). Both microphysical (effective radius) and macrophysical (liquid water path) cloud properties contribute to a fractional change in cloud optical depth; in the closed cell regime the microphysical contribution was 3 times larger than the macrophysical contribution. However, the opposite was true in the open cell regime where the macrophysical contribution was nearly 2 times larger than the microphysical contribution because the aerosol probably increased cloud coverage. The results presented here demonstrate key differences aerosols have on the microphysical and macrophysical responses of boundary layer clouds between mesoscale stratocumulus convective regimes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More recent studies show that aerosols can also change LWP and total cloud fraction (CF), which also greatly affect the amount of solar radiation reflected by clouds2,13–16.”
From Abrupt reduction in shipping emission as an inadvertent geoengineering termination shock produces substantial radiative warming (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness
Albrecht, B. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227 · Cited by 4,422
Pollution and the planetary albedo
Twomey, S. A. (1974) · Atmospheric Environment (1967) · doi:10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3 · Cited by 2,190
Chin, M., Ginoux, P. A., Kinne, S., Torres, O., HOLBEN, B. N., Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., Higurashi, A., & Nakajima, T. (2002) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059 · Cited by 1,580
The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing
Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., & Toon, O. B. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03174 · Cited by 846
Wood, R. W., & Hartmann, D. L. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3702.1 · Cited by 466
Effect of Ship-Stack Effluents on Cloud Reflectivity
Coakley, J. A., Bernstein, R. L., & Durkee, P. A. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.237.4818.1020 · Cited by 363
Effect of precipitation on the albedo susceptibility of clouds in the marine boundary layer
Pincus, R. L., & Baker, M. B. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372250a0 · Cited by 363
Vertical photon transport in cloud remote sensing problems
Platnick, S. E. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900333 · Cited by 328
Aerosol Effects on Clouds, Precipitation, and the Organization of Shallow Cumulus Convection
Xue, H., Feingold, G., & Stevens, B. (2008) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/2007jas2428.1 · Cited by 286
Impact of three‐dimensional radiative effects on satellite retrievals of cloud droplet sizes
Marshak, A. L., Platnick, S. E., Várnai, T., Wen, G., & Cahalan, R. F. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006686 · Cited by 255
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Durkee, 2000, The Monterey area ship track experiment, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2523, 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2523:TMASTE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Durkee, 2000, Composite ship track characteristics, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2542, 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2542:CSTC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Ferek, 2000, Drizzle suppression of ship tracks, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2707, 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2707:DSIST>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Hobbs, 2000, Emissions from ships with respect to their effects on clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2570, 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2570:EFSWRT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wood, R. (2012) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-11-00121.1 · Cited by 1,235
Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change
Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson‐Parris, D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A. ‐., et al. (2020) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2019rg000660 · Cited by 1,116
“…wide range of observational evidence from ship tracks, trends in anthropogenic906 emissions, and degassing volcanic eruptions (Gassó, 2008; Christensen & Stephens, 2011;907 Yuan, Remer, Pickering, & Yu, 2011; Christensen et al., 2014; McCoy & Hartmann, 2015;908 Malavelle et al., 2017;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSeinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C. S., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J., Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S. J., Guenther, A., Kahn, R. A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1514043113 · Cited by 967
Self-citationReview of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions: Mechanisms, Significance, and Challenges
Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D., & Liu, X. (2016) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas-d-16-0037.1 · Cited by 875
Stephens, G. L., O'Brien, D., Webster, P. J., Pilewski, P., Kato, S., & Li, J. (2015) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000449 · Cited by 324
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, M. W., & Stephens, G. L.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- D3
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082321592
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- ship track, marine stratocumulus, ship emissions, aerosol-cloud interactions, cloud microphysics, cloud macrophysics, cloud top height, liquid water path, cloud optical thickness, boundary layer clouds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
