Does higher surface temperature intensify extreme precipitation?: TEMPERATURE AND EXTREME RAINFALL
Open accessAbstract
Recently, against the backdrop of current climate, several regional studies have investigated the applicability of the Clausius-Clapeyron relation to the scaling relationship between extreme precipitation intensity and surface air temperature.Nevertheless, the temperature relationship of the extreme precipitation intensity on a global scale is still unclear.We assess, for the first time, the global relationship between the extreme daily precipitation intensity and the daily surface air temperature using in-situ data.The extreme daily precipitation intensity increased monotonically with the daily surface air temperature at high latitudes and decreased monotonically in the tropics.Similarly, the extreme daily precipitation intensity at middle latitudes increased at low temperatures and decreased at high temperatures; this decrease could be largely attributed to the decrease in the wet-event duration.The Clausius-Clapeyron scaling is applicable to the increase in the extreme daily precipitation intensity in a limited number of regions.However, the potential applicability of the Clausius-Clapeyron scaling on sub-hourly timescale was observed, even in regions where the Clausius-Clapeyron scaling on daily timescale was not applicable.This implies the potential of warming to intensify extreme precipitation on sub-hourly timescales.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar behavior to the Netherlands record was found in some but not all subsequent studies in different regions.
“Similar behavior was found in some but not all subsequent studies in different regions [10, 31, 48, 54, 87]; see [92] for an in-depth discussion.”
From Precipitation Extremes Under Climate Change (2015) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 382
- Authors
- Utsumi, N., Seto, S., Kanae, S., Maeda, E. E., & Oki, T.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- European Commission (BE)
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- n/a-n/a
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155051365
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- heavy rainfall, surface air temperature, Clausius-Clapeyron scaling, precipitation intensity, global warming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review