The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stable water isotopes in the ECHAM5 general circulation model: Toward high-resolution isotope modeling on a global scale
Abstract
[1] In this study, a first set of four present-day global experiments with the ECHAM5 atmospheric general circulation model enhanced by stable water isotope diagnostics (ECHAM5-wiso) is presented. Model resolution varies from a typical coarse horizontal grid of 3.8° × 3.8° (T31) to a fine grid of 0.75° × 0.75° (T159). Vertical resolution varies from 19 to 31 model levels. On a global scale, the ECHAM5-wiso simulation results are in good agreement with available observations of the isotopic composition of precipitation from the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP), on an annual as well as a seasonal time scale. In many instances, the isotope simulation results clearly benefit from an increased horizontal and vertical model resolution. The exemplary relevance of this model resolution dependence is demonstrated for the simulation of the isotopic composition of Antarctic precipitation. Here, the simulation with the fine T159L31 model resolution not only yields a better agreement with observational data sets but also allows for a more realistic retuning of the supersaturation function leading to improved deuterium excess performance over the Antarctic continent, which is important for the interpretation of polar ice cores. Finally, the ECHAM5-wiso simulation results are compared to newly available measurements of the isotopic composition of atmospheric water vapor. Model and data agree well, with differences in the range of ±10‰ for near-surface atmospheric values at several GNIP stations. A comparison of the ECHAM5-wiso simulations with total column averaged HDO data from the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY) instrument on board the environmental satellite Envisat shows the same latitudinal gradients but an offset between 20‰ and 50‰ of unknown origin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yao, T., Masson‐Delmotte, V., Gao, J., Yu, W., Yang, X., Risi, C., Sturm, C., Werner, M., Zhao, H., He, Y., et al. (2013) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/rog.20023 · Cited by 888
Self-citationStable isotopes in atmospheric water vapor and applications to the hydrologic cycle
Galewsky, J., Steen‐Larsen, H. C., Field, R. D., Worden, J., Risi, C., & Schneider, M. (2016) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2015rg000512 · Cited by 489
The Connected Isotopic Water Cycle in the Community Earth System Model Version 1
Brady, E., Stevenson, S., Bailey, D., Liu, Z., Noone, D., Nusbaumer, J., Otto‐Bliesner, B. L., Tabor, C., Tomas, R., Wong, T., et al. (2019) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001663 · Cited by 313
A stable isotope toolbox for water and inorganic carbon cycle studies
Hillaire-Marcel, C., Kim, S.-T., Landais, A., Ghosh, P., Assonov, S., Lécuyer, C., Blanchard, M., Meijer, H. A. J., & Steen-Larsen, H. C. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00209-0 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, M., Langebroek, P. M., Carlsen, T., Herold, M., & Lohmann, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-08-10
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- D15
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025424943
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stable water isotopes in the ECHAM5 general circulation model: Toward high-resolution isotope modeling on a global scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2011jd015681
- The paper
- Werner, M., Langebroek, P. M., Carlsen, T., Herold, M., & Lohmann, G. (2011). Stable water isotopes in the ECHAM5 general circulation model: Toward high-resolution isotope modeling on a global scale. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd015681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.