Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

North African dust export and deposition: A satellite and model perspective

Open access
Ridley, D. A., Heald, C. L., Ford, B.·2012·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We use a suite of satellite observations (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR), Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar With Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP)) to investigate the processes of long‐range transport of dust represented in the global GEOS‐Chem model in 2006–2008. A multiyear mean of African dust transport is developed and used to test the representation of the variability in the model. We find that both MODIS and MISR correlate well with the majority of Aerosol Robotic Network observations in the region (r> 0.8). However, MODIS aerosol optical depth (AOD) appears to be biased low (>0.05) relative to MISR in Saharan regions during summer. We find that GEOS‐Chem captures much of the variability in AOD when compared with MISR and MODIS (r> 0.6) and represents the vertical structure in aerosol extinction over outflow regions well when compared to CALIOP. Including a realistic representation of the submicron‐size distribution of dust reduces simulated AOD by ∼25% over North Africa and improves agreement with observations. The lifetime of the simulated dust is typically a few days (25%–50%) shorter than inferred from MODIS observations, suggesting overvigorous wet removal, confirmed by comparison with rain rate observations from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission satellite. The simulation captures the seasonality of deposition in Florida and the observed magnitude and variability of dust concentrations at Barbados from 2006 to 2008 (r = 0.74), indicating a good simulation of the impacts of North African dust on air quality in North America. We estimate that 218 ± 48 Tg of dust is annually deposited into the Atlantic and calculate a lower estimate for the dust deposited in the Caribbean and Amazon to be 26 ± 5 Tg yr−1 and 17 ± 5 Tg yr−1, respectively. This suggests that the dust deposition in the Amazon derived from satellites may be an upper limit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2011jd016794

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Ridley, D. A., Heald, C. L., & Ford, B.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2012-01-20
Volume
117
Issue
D2
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979319111
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: North African dust export and deposition: A satellite and model perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2011jd016794
The paper
Ridley, D. A., Heald, C. L., & Ford, B. (2012). North African dust export and deposition: A satellite and model perspective. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016794

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.