Cited by 358Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceSpacecraft Design and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lunar equatorial surface temperatures and regolith properties from the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment

Abstract

The Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment onboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has measured solar reflectance and mid‐infrared radiance globally, over four diurnal cycles, at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. These data are used to infer the radiative and bulk thermophysical properties of the near‐surface regolith layer at all longitudes around the equator. Normal albedos are estimated from solar reflectance measurements. Normal spectral emissivities relative to the 8‐μm Christiansen Feature are computed from brightness temperatures and used along with albedos as inputs to a numerical thermal model. Model fits to daytime temperatures require that the albedo increase with solar incidence angle. Measured nighttime cooling is remarkably similar across longitude and major geologic units, consistent with the scarcity of rock exposures and with the widespread presence of a near‐surface layer whose physical structure and thermal response are determined by pulverization through micrometeoroid impacts. Nighttime temperatures are best fit using a graded regolith model, with a ∼40% increase in bulk density and an eightfold increase in thermal conductivity (adjusted for temperature) occurring within several centimeters of the surface.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2011je003987

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Heiken G., 1991, Lunar Sourcebook

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–358 of 358

Metadata

Authors
Vasavada, A. R., Bandfield, J. L., Greenhagen, B. T., Hayne, P. O., Siegler, M. A., Williams, J., & Paige, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
117
Issue
E12
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126353612
Cited by
357
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
lunar surface temperature, lunar regolith, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, solar reflectance, thermal properties, thermal conductivity, albedo, emissivity, Christiansen feature, brightness temperature, night cooling, micrometeoroid impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review