Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mineral dust aerosols over the Sahara: Meteorological controls on emission and transport and implications for modeling

Open access
Knippertz, Peter, Todd, Martin C.·2012·Reviews of Geophysics

Abstract

Atmospheric mineral dust has recently become an important research field in Earth system science because of its impacts on radiation, clouds, atmospheric dynamics and chemistry, air quality, and biogeochemical cycles. Studying and modeling dust emission and transport over the world's largest source region, the Sahara, is particularly challenging because of the complex meteorology and a very sparse observational network. Recent advances in satellite retrievals together with ground‐ and aircraft‐based field campaigns have fostered our understanding of the spatiotemporal variability of the dust aerosol and its atmospheric drivers. We now have a more complete picture of the key processes in the atmosphere associated with dust emission. These cover a range of scales from (1) synoptic scale cyclones in the northern sector of the Sahara, harmattan surges and African easterly waves, through (2) low‐level jets and cold pools of mesoscale convective systems (particularly over the Sahel), to (3) microscale dust devils and dusty plumes, each with its own pronounced diurnal and seasonal characteristics. This paper summarizes recent progress on monitoring and analyzing the dust distribution over the Sahara and discusses implications for numerical modeling. Among the key challenges for the future are a better quantification of the relative importance of single processes and a more realistic representation of the effects of the smaller‐scale meteorological features in dust models. In particular, moist convection has been recognized as a major limitation to our understanding because of the inability of satellites to observe dust under clouds and the difficulties of numerical models to capture convective organization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2011rg000362

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 146 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1111/j.1600‐0889.2008.00384.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00384.x
  2. 10.1111/j.1600‐0889.2011.00555.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00555.x
  3. 10.2307/1785593 · doi:10.2307/1785593
  4. 10.5194/acpd‐11‐23513‐2011 · doi:10.5194/acpd-11-23513-2011
  5. Carboni E. G.Thomas R.Grainger C.Poulsen R.Siddans D.Peters E.Campmany A.Sayer andH.Brindley(2007) Retrieval of aerosol properties from SEVIRI using visible and infrared channels paper presented at Joint 2007 EUMETSAT/AMS Conference Amsterdam 24–28 Sep.
  6. Carboni E., 2009, Desert‐dust satellite retrieval intercomparison, Geophys. Res. Abs., 11
  7. 10.1029/2006GL027771 · doi:10.1029/2006gl027771
  8. 10.1016/S0169‐8095(01)00092‐8 · doi:10.1016/s0169-8095(01)00092-8
  9. 10.1002/qj.863 · doi:10.1002/qj.863
  10. 10.1029/2008JD011236 · doi:10.1029/2008jd011236
  11. 10.5194/acpd‐5‐5615‐2005 · doi:10.5194/acpd-5-5615-2005
  12. 10.1016/j.rse.2004.09.009 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.09.009
  13. 10.1029/2004GL020710 · doi:10.1029/2004gl020710
  14. Dubief J., 1979, Saharan Dust, 27
  15. 10.1029/2009JD012863 · doi:10.1029/2009jd012863
  16. 10.1029/2008JD010275 · doi:10.1029/2008jd010275
  17. 10.1080/01431160600646359 · doi:10.1080/01431160600646359
  18. 10.1002/qj.49706327111 · doi:10.1002/qj.49706327111
  19. 10.1007/978-3-642-55844-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Forster P., 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 129
  21. Freeman M.(1952) Duststorms of the Anglo‐Egyptian Sudan Meteorol. Rep. Ser. vol.11 22 pp. Her Majesty's Stn. Off. London.
  22. 10.1007/BF00119441 · doi:10.1007/bf00119441
  23. 10.1175/1520‐0450(2001)040<1095:EOMMSO>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040
  24. 10.1007/s00382‐010‐0941‐9 · doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0941-9
  25. 10.1002/qj.797 · doi:10.1002/qj.797
  26. 10.1002/qj.770 · doi:10.1002/qj.770
  27. 10.1111/j.1600‐0889.2008.00403.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00403.x
  28. 10.1046/j.1365‐3091.2001.00359.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3091.2001.00359.x
  29. 10.1029/2008JD009955 · doi:10.1029/2008jd009955
  30. 10.1256/qj.03.172 · doi:10.1256/qj.03.172
  31. 10.1029/2010JD014649 · doi:10.1029/2010jd014649
  32. 10.1175/1520‐0469(1988)045<3102:AANSOT>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045
  33. 10.1029/2010GL042816 · doi:10.1029/2010gl042816
  34. 10.5194/amt‐4‐757‐2011 · doi:10.5194/amt-4-757-2011
  35. 10.1029/2008JD011271 · doi:10.1029/2008jd011271
  36. 10.1111/j.1600‐0889.2008.00380.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00380.x
  37. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.02.012 · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.02.012
  38. 10.1002/j.1477-8696.1971.tb07402.x · doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1971.tb07402.x
  39. 10.1029/2010GL043245 · doi:10.1029/2010gl043245
  40. 10.5194/acp‐8‐6979‐2008b · doi:10.5194/acp-8-6979-2008b
  41. 10.1029/2011GL048368 · doi:10.1029/2011gl048368
  42. McTainsh G. H., 1999, Aeolian Environments, Sediments and Landforms, 181
  43. 10.1002/j.1477-8696.1985.tb06877.x · doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1985.tb06877.x
  44. 10.1029/2007JD009522 · doi:10.1029/2007jd009522
  45. 10.5194/acp‐9‐3223‐2009 · doi:10.5194/acp-9-3223-2009
  46. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(02)07304‐X · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07304-x
  47. 10.1029/2008GL036041 · doi:10.1029/2008gl036041
  48. 10.1029/2000JD900794 · doi:10.1029/2000jd900794
  49. 10.1002/asl.249 · doi:10.1002/asl.249
  50. 10.1029/2011JD016010 · doi:10.1029/2011jd016010
  51. 10.1029/2008JD009906 · doi:10.1029/2008jd009906
  52. 10.1364/AO.40.003060 · doi:10.1364/ao.40.003060
  53. 10.1029/2005GL022798 · doi:10.1029/2005gl022798
  54. 10.1127/0941‐2948/2008/0269 · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0269
  55. Schulz M., 2009, The Aerosol Model Comparison Project, AeroCom, Phase II: Clearing up diversity, IGAC Newsl., 41, 2
  56. 10.1007/s10546‐004‐7089‐2 · doi:10.1007/s10546-004-7089-2
  57. 10.1029/2009JD012678 · doi:10.1029/2009jd012678
  58. 10.1029/2010GL044355 · doi:10.1029/2010gl044355
  59. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.07.016 · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.07.016
  60. 10.1175/1520‐0450(1969)008<0032:GCODD>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1969)008
  61. 10.1029/2008GL035900 · doi:10.1029/2008gl035900
  62. 10.2151/jmsj.83A.187 · doi:10.2151/jmsj.83a.187
  63. 10.1016/j.crte.2010.02.003 · doi:10.1016/j.crte.2010.02.003
  64. 10.1002/qj.126 · doi:10.1002/qj.126
  65. 10.5194/amt‐2‐679‐2009 · doi:10.5194/amt-2-679-2009
  66. 10.1029/2003JD004381 · doi:10.1029/2003jd004381
  67. 10.1007/978-1-935704-06-5_7 · doi:10.1007/978-1-935704-06-5_7
  68. 10.1175/1520‐0450(2004)043<0157:DCOSWA>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043
  69. 10.1175/1520‐0493(2003)131<1301:AEOTMR>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Knippertz, P., & Todd, M. C.
Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
2012-02-14
Volume
50
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1209
  • 1944-9208
OpenAlex
W2067486888
Cited by
406
References
146
FWCI
15.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mineral dust aerosols over the Sahara: Meteorological controls on emission and transport and implications for modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2011rg000362
The paper
Knippertz, P., & Todd, M. C. (2012). Mineral dust aerosols over the Sahara: Meteorological controls on emission and transport and implications for modeling. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011rg000362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.