The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling soil heating and moisture transport under extreme conditions: Forest fires and slash pile burns
Open accessAbstract
Heating any soil during a sufficiently intense wildfire or prescribed burn can alter it irreversibly, causing many significant, long‐term biological, chemical, and hydrological effects. Given the climate‐change‐driven increasing probability of wildfires and the increasing use of prescribed burns by land managers, it is important to better understand the dynamics of the coupled heat and moisture transport in soil during these extreme heating events. Furthermore, improved understanding and modeling of heat and mass transport during extreme conditions should provide insights into the associated transport mechanisms under more normal conditions. The present study describes a numerical model developed to simulate soil heat and moisture transport during fires where the surface heating often ranges between 10,000 and 100,000 W m−2 for several minutes to several hours. Basically, the model extends methods commonly used to model coupled heat flow and moisture evaporation at ambient conditions into regions of extreme dryness and heat. But it also incorporates some infrequently used formulations for temperature dependencies of the soil specific heat, thermal conductivity, and the water retention curve, as well as advective effects due to the large changes in volume that occur when liquid water is rapidly volatilized. Model performance is tested against laboratory measurements of soil temperature and moisture changes at several depths during controlled heating events. Qualitatively, the model agrees with the laboratory observations, namely, it simulates an increase in soil moisture ahead of the drying front (due to the condensation of evaporated soil water at the front) and a hiatus in the soil temperature rise during the strongly evaporative stage of the soil drying. Nevertheless, it is shown that the model is incapable of producing a physically realistic solution because it does not (and, in fact, cannot) represent the relationship between soil water potential and soil moisture at extremely low soil moisture contents (i.e., residual or bound water: θ < 0.01 m 3 m−3, for example). Diagnosing the model's performance yields important insights into how to make progress on modeling soil evaporation and heating under conditions of high temperatures and very low soil moisture content.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The magnitude of fire effects on soils depends on above-ground fire behaviour (Massman, 2012), organic horizon depth and moisture content (Hartford & Frandsen, 1992) and the physical properties of mineral soil (Giovannini, Lucchesi, & Giachetti, 1988).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Massman, 2012
In the citing paper
“Below-ground fire behaviour has been advanced by a small number of observational, experimental and model-based approaches (Huang & Rein, 2015;Massman, 2012).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Massman, 2012
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Antilén M., 2006, Mathematical modeling of temperature profile of volcanic soils affected by an external thermal impact, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 44, 57
- 10.1071/SR9760055 · DOI
- 10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<468::AID-JPLN468>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
- Butler B., 2010, Forest Fire Research
- Campbell G. S., 1985, Soil Physics With BASIC
- Campbell G. S., 1992, Indirect Methods for Estimating the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Soils, 317
- 10.1097/00010694-199311000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1097/00010694-199411000-00001 · DOI
- 10.1097/00010694-199506000-00001 · DOI
- 10.1201/9781439843338 · DOI
- 10.13031/2013.30391 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05757.x · DOI
- DeBano L. F., 1998, Fire's Effects on Ecosystems
- Vries D. A., 1963, Physics of Plant Environment, 201
- 10.1007/BF00208950 · DOI
- Durany J., 2010, Forest Fire Research
- 10.1139/t94-061 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.020 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1952.tb01025.x · DOI
- 10.1139/t75-025 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.555707 · DOI
- 10.1080/10407790590963596 · DOI
- Levitt J., 1980, Chilling, Freezing, and High Temperature Stresses
- 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.06.004 · DOI
- Lynch D. R., 2005, Numerical Partial Differential Equations for Environmental Scientists and Engineers
- 10.1071/WF06118 · DOI
- 10.4996/fireecology.0601036 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00172-7 · DOI
- 10.1029/WR018i003p00489 · DOI
- 10.1097/00010694-199709000-00004 · DOI
- Neary D. G., 2005, Wildland Fire in Ecosystems, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS‐GTR‐42
- 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1006749505937 · DOI
- 10.1071/WF9970051 · DOI
- Pafford D., 1985, Weather: The Drive Train Connecting the Solar Engine to Forest Ecosystems, Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology
- 10.1017/S0021859600048164 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0021859600048231 · DOI
- 10.1029/TR038i002p00222 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1009615032159 · DOI
- 10.1029/2010WR010229 · DOI
- Richards J. M., 1971, Simple expression for the saturation vapor pressure of water in the range of −50 to 140, Br. J. Appl. Phys., 4, L15
- 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01204.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2010WR009533 · DOI
- 10.1139/x90-124 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-7278-1 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.555688 · DOI
- 10.1080/07373938308916768 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729
“Below-ground fire behaviour has been advanced by a small number of observational, experimental and model-based approaches (Huang & Rein, 2015; Massman, 2012).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Massman, W. J.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Massman, W. J.
- ORCID
- Massman, W. J.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1897629047
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
- Keywords
- soil heat transfer, soil moisture transport, forest fires, prescribed burning, soil drying, soil evaporation, soil water retention curve, thermal conductivity, soil temperature, soil moisture, drying front, condensation, residual water, numerical modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review