Cited by 48Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFire effects on ecosystemsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Evidence for El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) influence on Arctic CO interannual variability through biomass burning emissions

Open access
Monks, S. A., Arnold, S. R., Chipperfield, M. P.·2012·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

A global chemical transport model is used in conjunction with measurements from surface stations to study the importance of biomass burning and meteorology in driving Arctic carbon monoxide (CO) interannual variability (IAV). Simulations with yearly varying fire emissions capture 66%–93% of CO IAV and a simulation with yearly varying meteorology but fixed fire emissions captures 0–25%, showing that biomass burning variability is the dominant driver of surface CO IAV. Observed CO anomalies are found to be significantly correlated with El Niño (0.58 < r < 0.64, 99% confidence level (CL)) and results indicate that this is due to ENSO's influence on fire emissions. Boreal Alaska, Canada and north‐east Siberia are found to contribute 59% to total Arctic fire CO and 67% to Arctic fire CO IAV. Analysis of meteorological fire drivers in these regions suggests that ENSO affects winter/spring precipitation, driving the Arctic/ENSO relationship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2012gl052512

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boreal fires have been shown to be the main driver of interannual variability in CO observed at several surface sites in the North American and European Arctic.

    “Boreal fi res have been shown to be the main driver of interannual variability in CO observed at several surface sites in the North American and European Arctic (Monks et al., 2012).”

    From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Monks et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 48

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Arnold, S. R., M. P. Chipperfield, and M. A. Blitz (2005), A three- dimensional model study of the effect of new temperature-dependent quantum yields for acetone photolysis, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D22305, doi:10.1029/2005JD005998. · DOI
  2. Bartsch, A., H. Balzter, and C. George (2009), The influence of regional surface soil moisture anomalies on forest fires in Siberia observed from satellites, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 045021, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/ 045021. · DOI
  3. Beverly, J. L., M. D. Flannigan, B. J. Stocks, and P. Bothwell (2011), The association between Northern Hemisphere climate patterns and interan- nual variability in Canadian wildfire activity, Can. J. Forest Res., 41, 2193-2201, doi:10.1139/x11-131. · DOI
  4. Crevoisier, C., E. Shevliakova, M. Gloor, C. Wirth, and S. Pacala (2007), Drivers of fire in the boreal forests: Data constrained design of a prognos- tic model of burned area for use in dynamic global vegetation models, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24112, doi:10.1029/2006JD008372. · DOI
  5. Duncan, B. N., J. A. Logan, I. Bey, I. A. Megretskaia, R. M. Yantosca, P. C. Novelli, N. B. Jones, and C. P. Rinsland (2007), Global budget of CO, 1988-1997: Source estimates and validation with a global model, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D22301, doi:10.1029/2007JD008459. · DOI
  6. Fauria, M. M., and E. A. Johnson (2008), Climate and wildfires in the North American boreal forest, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 363, 2317-2329. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2202. · DOI
  7. Kitzberger, T., P. M. Brown, E. K. Heyerdahl, T. W. Swetnam, and T. T. Veblen (2007), Contingent Pacific-Atlantic Ocean influence on multicentury wildfire synchrony over western North America, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 343-548.
  8. Legrand, M., M. De Angelis, T. Staffelbach, A. Neftel, and B. Stauffer (1992), Large perturbations of ammonium and organic acids content in the summit Greenland Ice Core: Fingerprint from forest fires?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 473-475, doi:10.1029/91GL03121. · DOI
  9. Novelli, P. C., K. A. Masarie, and P. M. Lang (1998), Distributions and recent changes of carbon monoxide in the lower troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 19,015-19,033, doi:10.1029/98JD01366. · DOI
  10. Randerson, J. T., et al. (2006), The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming, Science, 314(5802), 1130-1132.
  11. Shindell, D. (2007), Local and remote contributions to Arctic warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L14704, doi:10.1029/2007GL030221. · DOI
  12. Skinner, W. R., A. Shabbar, M. D. Flannigan, and K. Logan (2006), Large forest fires in Canada and the relationship to global sea surface tempera- tures, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D14106, doi:10.1029/2005JD006738. · DOI
  13. Szopa, S., D. A. Hauglustaine, and P. Ciais (2007), Relative contributions of biomass burning emissions and atmospheric transport to carbon mon- oxide interannual variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L18810, doi:10.1029/2007GL030231. · DOI
  14. Wofsy, S. C., et al. (1992), Atmospheric chemistry in the Arctic and subarc- tic: Influence of natural fires, industrial emissions, and stratospheric input, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 16,731-16,746, doi:10.1029/92JD00622. · DOI

Authors
Monks, S. A., Arnold, S. R., & Chipperfield, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Monks, S. A.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2012-07-28
Volume
39
Issue
14
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1593331112
Cited by
48
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H020241/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
ENSO, interannual variability, biomass burning emissions, fire emissions, rainfall variability, Arctic meteorology, chemical transport model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review