The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Ensemble Version of the E‐OBS Temperature and Precipitation Data Sets
Open accessAbstract
We describe the construction of a new version of the Europe‐wide E‐OBS temperature (daily minimum, mean, and maximum values) and precipitation data set. This version provides an improved estimation of interpolation uncertainty through the calculation of a 100‐member ensemble of realizations of each daily field. The data set covers the period back to 1950 and provides gridded fields at a spacing of 0.25 ∘ × 0.25 ∘ in regular latitude/longitude coordinates. As with the original E‐OBS data set, the ensemble version is based on the station series collated as part of the ECA&D initiative. Station density varies significantly over the domain, and over time, and a reliable estimation of interpolation uncertainty in the gridded fields is therefore important for users of the data set. The uncertainty quantified by the ensemble data set is more realistic than the uncertainty estimates in the original version, although uncertainty is still underestimated in data‐sparse regions. The new data set is compared against the earlier version of E‐OBS and against regional gridded data sets produced by a selection of National Meteorological Services. In terms of both climatological averages and extreme values, the new version of E‐OBS is broadly comparable to the earlier version. Nonetheless, users will notice differences between the two E‐OBS versions, especially for precipitation, which arises from the different gridding method used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wood, S. N. (2006) · doi:10.1201/9781420010404 · Cited by 4,953
Cited by
The ERA5 global reanalysis: Preliminary extension to 1950
Bell, B., Hersbach, H., Simmons, A., Berrisford, P., Dahlgren, P., Horányi, A., Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Radu, R., Schepers, D., et al. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.4174 · Cited by 689
Machine Learning Methods in Weather and Climate Applications: A Survey
Chen, L., Han, B., Wang, X., Zhao, J., Yang, W., & Yang, Z. (2023) · doi:10.20944/preprints202309.1764.v2 · Cited by 246
Seasonal prediction of European summer heatwaves
Prodhomme, C., Materia, S., Ardilouze, C., White, R. H., Batté, L., Guemas, V., Fragkoulidis, G., & García-Serrano, J. (2022) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-021-05828-3 · Cited by 63
Weirich-Benet, E., Pyrina, M., Jiménez-Esteve, B., Fraenkel, E., Cohen, J., & Domeisen, D. I. V. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems · doi:10.1175/aies-d-22-0038.1 · Cited by 33
Limited impact of climate forcing products on future glacier evolution in Scandinavia and Iceland
Compagno, L., Zekollari, H., Huss, M., & Farinotti, D. (2021) · Journal of Glaciology · doi:10.1017/jog.2021.24 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornes, R. C., van der Schrier, G., van den Besselaar, E. J. M., & Jones, P. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2018-09-12
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 9391-9409
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-897X
- 2169-8996
- OpenAlex
- W2887293259
- Cited by
- 1,838
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 65.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Ensemble Version of the E‐OBS Temperature and Precipitation Data Sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2017jd028200
- The paper
- Cornes, R. C., van der Schrier, G., van den Besselaar, E. J. M., & Jones, P. D. (2018). An Ensemble Version of the E‐OBS Temperature and Precipitation Data Sets. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jd028200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.