Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evolution of the Magma Conduit Beneath the Galeras Volcano Inferred From Repeated Seismic Tomography

Koulakov, Ivan, Vargas, Carlos A.·2018·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The Colombian volcano Galeras is one of the most active volcanoes in the world, and it has an andesitic composition and high explosive potential. We consider the period of 1989–2015, in which the volcano manifested frequent eruptions and high seismic activity. To study the temporal variations in the seismic structure beneath Galeras, we implemented an algorithm of repeated tomography using selected data sets with similar geometries. We obtained the variations in the seismic velocity structures beneath Galeras during the three time episodes of 1989–2000, 2001–2007, and 2008–2015. In the second episode, we observe a columnar anomaly with a high Vp/Vs ratio that possibly represents a conduit transporting a new portion of magma material from below. This result may indicate that in this period, which culminated with dome emplacement and collapse, the volcano was directly fed from deeper magma sources. In other episodes, the conduit is less visible in the tomography models, and we propose that the volcanic activity was merely controlled by shallow magma reservoirs at 2–4 km below the surface.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2018gl078850

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1016/S0377-0273(96)00085-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0377-0273(96)00083-2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1029/2006GL025751 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0377-0273(96)00089-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0377-0273(96)00091-1 · DOI
  6. Global Volcanism Program(2014).Report on Galeras (Colombia). In: Wunderman R (ed.) Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network 39:1. Smithsonian Institution.https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.BGVN201401‐351080 · DOI
  7. 10.1029/2003JB002565 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.04.010 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/2013JB010935 · DOI
  10. 10.1785/0120080013 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/2016JB013002 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2012.10.014 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/grl.50674 · DOI
  14. 10.3390/geosciences7040111 · DOI
  15. 10.1785/0120080366 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.05.023 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0377-0273(96)00092-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.1127724 · DOI
  19. Sanchez J. J., 2005, Spatial mapping of the b‐value at Galeras volcano, Colombia, using earthquakes recorded from 1995 to 2002, Earth Sciences Research Journal, 9, 29
  20. 10.1016/0012-821X(89)90025-3 · DOI
  21. 10.1029/2001JB000522 · DOI
  22. 10.1029/JB094iB12p17523 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/srep46094 · DOI
  24. Vargas C. A., 2012, Attenuation structure of the Galeras volcano, Colombia, Boletín de Geología, 34, 149
  25. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.05.007 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Koulakov, I., & Vargas, C. A.
Affiliations
  • SB RAS Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics Novosibirsk Russia
  • Department of Geosciences, Ciudad Universitaria Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota Colombia
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2018-08-11
Volume
45
Issue
15
Pages
7514-7522
ISSN
  • 0094-8276
  • 1944-8007
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (FP44842‐006‐2016)
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research (16‐05‐00477)
  • Russian Science Foundation (14‐17‐00430)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review