Cited by 48Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

SO2 Oxidation Kinetics Leave a Consistent Isotopic Imprint on Volcanic Ice Core Sulfate

Open access
Gautier, Elsa, Savarino, Joel, Erbland, Joseph, Farquhar, James·2018·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

This work presents measurements of time‐resolved mass‐independently fractionated sulfate of volcanic origin from Antarctic ice core records that cover the last 2,600 years. These measurements are used to evaluate the time dependence of the deposited isotopic signal and to extract the isotopic characteristics of the reactions yielding sulfate from stratospheric volcanic eruptions in the modern atmosphere. Time evolution of the signal in snow (years) with respect to the fast SO 2 oxidation in the stratosphere suggests that photochemically produced condensed phase is rapidly and continuously separated from the gas phase and preserved during transportation and deposition on the polar ice cap. On some eruptions, a nonzero isotopic mass balance highlights that a part of the signal can be lost during transport and/or deposition. The large number of volcanic events studied allows the Δ 33 S versus Δ 36 S and δ34 S versus Δ 33 S slopes to be constrained at −1.56 (1 σ = 0.25) and 0.09 (1 σ = 0.02), respectively. The Δ 33 S versus Δ 36 S slope refines a prior determinations of Δ 36 S/Δ 33 S = −4 and overlaps the range observed for sulfur seen in early Earth samples (Archean). In recent volcanogenic sulfate, the Δ 33 S versus δ34 S differs, however, from the Archean record. The similitude for Δ 36 S/Δ 33 S and the difference for Δ 33 S/δ34 S suggest similar mass‐independently fractionated sulfate processes to the Archean atmosphere. Using a simple model, we highlight that a combination of several mechanisms is needed to reproduce the observed isotopic trends and suggest a greater contribution from mass‐dependent oxidation by OH in the modern atmosphere.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2018jd028456

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 48

Authors
Gautier, E., Savarino, J., Erbland, J., & Farquhar, J.
Affiliations
  • Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
  • Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE Grenoble France
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Gautier, Elsa
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2018-09-04
Volume
123
Issue
17
Pages
9801-9812
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W2888280234
Cited by
48
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (NT09‐431976‐ VOLSOL)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
volcanic sulfate, Antarctic ice cores, sulfur isotope fractionation, sulfur-33, sulfur-34, Archean atmosphere, sulfur cycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review