Cited by 91Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsClimate variability and models

Stratospheric sulfate aerosol geoengineering could alter the high-latitude seasonal cycle

Open access
Jiang, Jiu, Cao, Long, MacMartin, Douglas G., Simpson, Isla R., Kravitz, Ben, Cheng, Wei, Visioni, Daniele, Tilmes, Simone +2 more·2019·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Abstract Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) has been proposed to reduce some impacts of anthropogenic climate change. Previous studies examined annual mean climate responses to SAG. Here we use the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble simulations to explore the effects of SAG on the seasonal cycle of climate change. Simulations show that relative to the present‐day climate, SAG diminishes the amplitude of the seasonal cycle of temperature at many high‐latitude locations, with warmer winters and cooler summers. The seasonal temperature shift significantly influences the seasonal cycle of snow depth and sea ice, with Arctic sea ice recovery overcompensated in summer by 52% and undercompensated in winter by 8%. We identify that both the dynamic effects of aerosol‐induced stratospheric heating and seasonal variations of sunlight contribute to the shifts in seasonal cycle. Shifts in the seasonal cycle have important ecological and environmental implications, which should be considered in geoengineering impact analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2019gl085758

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many regions could face a seasonal under- or over-compensation in rainfall compared to a high warming average (RCP8.5) from 2010 to 2030, assuming SAI is implemented to mask 5 degrees of warming.

    “Many regions could face a seasonal under- or over-compensation in rainfall (compared to a high warming average (RCP8.5) from 2010 to 2030, and assuming SAI is implemented to mask 5 degrees of warming) (Jiang et al., 2019).”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2019

    Section 2.1 describes an RCP8.5 2010–2030 baseline and SAI simulations providing 5.0 K of cooling in 2075–2095. Section 3 reports seasonal changes in high-latitude temperature and sea ice, including summer overcompensation and winter undercompensation of Arctic sea ice extent. The paper does not report the claimed seasonal under- or overcompensation in rainfall across many regions. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased sulfate concentrations could impact high latitude seasonal temperature cycles.

    “high latitude seasonal temperature cycles (Jiang et al 2019)”

    From The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100 (2020) · cites this paper as Jiang et al 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 91

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2014JD022734 · DOI
  2. 2018EF001146 · DOI
  3. National Research Council (2015). Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool earth (p. 234). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Authors
Jiang, J., Cao, L., MacMartin, D. G., Simpson, I. R., Kravitz, B., Cheng, W., Visioni, D., Tilmes, S., Richter, J. H., & Mills, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Cao, Long
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2019-12-06
Volume
46
Issue
23
Pages
14153-14163
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2993595574
Cited by
91
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 6
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CBET‐1931641)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41422503, 41675063)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB953601)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, sulfate aerosols, seasonal cycle, high-latitude climate, Arctic sea ice, snow depth, stratospheric heating, solar forcing, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review