The impact of cloud processing on the ice nucleation abilities of soot particles at cirrus temperatures
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Soot particles are generally considered to be poor ice nucleating particles. Involvement of soot in clouds and their release back into the atmosphere can form residual particles with altered cloud forming potential. The impact and extent of such different cloud processing scenarios on ice nucleation is, however, not well understood. In this work, we present the impact of cloud processing of soot aerosols on subsequent ice nucleation cycles at T≤233 K. Coupling of two continuous flow diffusion chambers allows the simulation of different cloud processing scenarios and investigation of subsequent ice nucleation activity of the processed particles. The processing scenarios presented here encompass contrail, cirrus, and mixed‐phase cloud processing, mimicking typical pathways that soot particles can be exposed to in the atmosphere. For all scenarios tested, the processed particles showed an enhanced ice active fraction for T<233 K. The relative humidity with respect to water for the ice nucleation onset was observed to be on average approximately 10% (relative humidity with respect to ice, RHi≈16%) lower for the cloud‐processed particles compared to the unprocessed soot for which ice nucleation was observed close to or at homogeneous freezing conditions of solution droplets. We attribute the enhanced ice nucleation abilities of the cloud‐processed soot to a pore condensation and freezing mechanism and have identified key parameters governing these changes. Enhanced ice nucleation abilities of soot in cirrus clouds can have significant impacts, given the importance of the atmospheric ice phase for precipitation formation and global climate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect of enhanced IN activity after sublimation was limited to large soot particles, suggesting that the impact of aviation soot on cloudiness may be overestimated in previous studies that assume soot processed through contrails and not covered by a sulfate coating is an efficient IN.
“The effect was limited to large soot particles, suggesting that the impact of aviation soot on cloudiness may be overestimated in previous studies that assume soot processed through contrails and not covered by a sul fate coating is an efficient IN (Penner et al., 2018).”
From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Mahrt et al., 2020
Cites
Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions
Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., D’Ascoli, E., Kim, J., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Beaton, B., Beyersdorf, A. J., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21420 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Ice formation by black carbon particles
DeMott, P. J., Chen, Y., Kreidenweis, S. M., Rogers, D. C., & Sherman, D. E. (1999) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/1999gl900580 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834 · Cited by 1,715 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mahrt, F., Kilchhofer, K., Marcolli, C., Grönquist, P., David, R. O., Rösch, M., Lohmann, U., & Kanji, Z. A.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Department of Environmental System Science, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland
- Corresponding author
- Mahrt, Fabian
- Kanji, Zamin A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2020-02-06
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-897X
- 2169-8996
- OpenAlex
- W2952907813
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH-25-15-1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
- Keywords
- soot particles, ice nucleation, cloud processing, cirrus clouds, ice nucleating particles, pore condensation, freezing, mixed-phase clouds, contrails, relative humidity, continuous flow diffusion chamber, aerosol-cloud interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review