The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Martian Year 34 Column Dust Climatology from Mars Climate Sounder Observations: Reconstructed Maps and Model Simulations
Open accessAbstract
We have reconstructed longitude‐latitude maps of column dust optical depth (CDOD) for Martian year (MY) 34 (5 May 2017– 23 March 2019), using observations by the Mars Climate Sounder (MCS) aboard NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. Our methodology works by gridding a combination of standard (v5.2) and novel (v5.3.2) estimates of CDOD from MCS limb observations, using an improved “Iterative Weighted Binning.” In this work, we have produced four gridded CDOD maps per sol, at different Mars Universal Times. Together with the seasonal and daily variability, the use of several maps per sol also allows us to explore the diurnal variability of CDOD in the MCS dataset, which is shown to be particularly strong during the MY 34 equinoctial global dust event (GDE). In order to understand whether the diurnal variability of CDOD has a physical explanation, and examine the impact of the MY 34 GDE on some aspects of the atmospheric circulation, we have carried out numerical simulations with the “Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique” Mars Global Climate Model. We show that the model is able to account for at least part of the observed CDOD diurnal variability. This is particularly true in the southern hemisphere where a strong diurnal wave at the time of the GDE is able to displace dust horizontally as well as vertically. The simulations also clearly show the impact of the MY 34 GDE on the mean meridional circulation and the super‐rotating equatorial jet, similarly to the effects of the equinoctial GDE in MY 25.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Martian dust clouds can dim the daylight and typically measure up to several hundreds of km in size; most form, evolve, and dissipate over the course of a few days.
“These clouds of dust can dim the daylight and typically measure up to several hundreds of km in size; most of the time, these clouds form, evolve, and then dissipate over the course of a few days.”
From Sleep disruption, use of sleep-promoting medication and circadian desynchronization in spaceflight crewmembers: Evidence in low-Earth orbit and concerns for future deep-space exploration missions (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes dust storms as causing strong radiative effects and altering the surface energy budget, which supports the daylight-dimming point. The paper does not establish that dust clouds typically measure up to several hundred kilometres or that most dissipate within a few days; its discussion of the MY 34 event instead describes decay over about 130 sols (section 3, p. 11). (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDust storms are a major characteristic of the atmospheric inter-annual, seasonal, day-to-day, and daily variability and a source of hazards for future human exploration.
“They are a major characteristic of the atmospheric inter-annual, seasonal, day-to-day, and daily variability and a source of hazards for future human exploration [26].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1029/2019JE006122 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.08.019 · DOI
- Chapman S., 1970, Atmospheric tides. Thermal and gravitational
- 10.1002/jgre.20104 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.025 · DOI
- 10.1029/2006JE002871 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019JE006092 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.08.006 · DOI
- 10.1029/2018GL080839 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41550-017-0353-4 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019GL084266 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781139060172.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016GL068978 · DOI
- Kass D., 2019, Mars Climate Sounder observation of Mars' 2018 global dust storm, Geophysical Research Letters, 46
- Kleinböhl A., 2017, The Mars Atmosphere: Modelling and Observation, 2230
- 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.07.009 · DOI
- 10.1002/grl.50497 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1029/2009JE003358 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019JE006115 · DOI
- Levine J. S., 2018, Dust in the atmosphere of mars and its impact on human exploration
- 10.1016/j.asr.2005.05.122 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.039 · DOI
- 10.1029/2002JE001933 · DOI
- 10.1029/2011JE003855 · DOI
- 10.1029/2012GL053564 · DOI
- 10.1029/92JE02937 · DOI
- 10.1029/2006JE002790 · DOI
- Montabone L., 2018, Dust in the atmosphere of mars and its impact on human exploration
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.12.034 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.047 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/2013JE004550 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.03.030 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB084iB06p02821 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019GL083207 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019GL084317 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019JE006107 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11214-018-0543-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/jgre.20046 · DOI
- 10.1038/ngeo3008 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019GL083936 · DOI
- 10.1029/2005JE002485 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.029 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019JE005985 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017JE005255 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<1290:CMSOTT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11214-012-9876-2 · DOI
- Xiaohua F., 2020, Mars dust storm effects in the ionosphere and magnetosphere and implications for atmospheric carbon loss, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 125, e2019JA026838, 10.1029/2019JA026838 · DOI
- 10.1016/0019-1035(82)90127-0 · DOI
- 10.1029/92JE02936 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albornoz-Miranda, M., Parrao, D., & Taverne, M. (2023) · Sleep Medicine: X · doi:10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100080 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Montabone, L., Spiga, A., Kass, D. M., Kleinböhl, A., Forget, F., & Millour, E.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Montabone, Luca
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 2169-9097 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-9100
- OpenAlex
- W2960285999
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AN06G)
- Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif (2019‐A0060110391)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Keywords
- Martian dust, Mars Climate Sounder, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, diurnal variation, meridional circulation, Mars atmosphere
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review