The Influence of Channel Deepening on Tides, River Discharge Effects, and Storm Surge
Abstract
We combine archival research, semi‐analytical models, and numerical simulations to address the following question: how do changes to channel geometry alter tidal properties and flood dynamics in a hyposynchronous, strongly frictional estuary with a landward decay in tidal amplitudes? Records in the Saint Johns River Estuary since the 1890s show that tidal range has doubled in Jacksonville, Florida. Near the estuary inlet, tidal discharge approximately doubled but tidal amplitudes increased only ∼6%. Modeling shows that increased shipping channel depths from ∼5 to ∼13m drove the observed changes, with other factors like channel shortening and width reduction producing comparatively minor effects. Tidal amplitude increases are spatially variable, with a maximum change 20–25 km from the estuary inlet; tidal theory suggests that increases in amplitude approximately follow , where x is the distance from the ocean and μ is a damping coefficient. Tidal changes are a predictor of altered surge dynamics: Numerical modeling of hurricane Irma under 1898 and 2017 bathymetric conditions confirms that both tidal and storm surge amplitudes are larger today, with a similar spatial pattern. Nonetheless, peak water levels are simulated to be larger under 1898 bathymetry. The cause is likely the record river discharge observed during the storm; as suggested by a subtidal water‐level model, channel deepening since 1898 appears to have reduced the average surface slope required to drain both mean…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Examples of anthropogenically altered systems with secular shifts include the Hudson River and Saint Johns River.
“Examples include the Hudson River (Ralston et al. 2019) and Saint Johns River (Talke et al. 2021).”
From Shallow-Water Habitat in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: A Highly Altered System (2024) · cites this paper as Talke et al. 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shallow-Water Habitat in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: A Highly Altered System
Templeton, W. J., Jay, D. A., Diefenderfer, H. L., & Talke, S. A. (2024) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-023-01229-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Examples include the Hudson River (Ralston et al. 2019) and Saint Johns River (Talke et al. 2021).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Talke, S. A., Familkhalili, R., & Jay, D. A.
- Affiliations
- California Polytechnic State University (US)
- Old Dominion University (US)
- Portland State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Talke, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2169-9275 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-9291
- OpenAlex
- W3157646652
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans (publishedVersion)
- ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
- PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1455350, 2013280)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aquatic and Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- channel deepening, tidal range, tidal amplitude, river discharge, storm surge, hurricane storm surge, tidal damping, flood vulnerability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review