Lithospheric Density Structure and Effective Elastic Thickness Beneath Himalaya and Tibetan Plateau: Inference From the Integrated Analysis of Gravity, Geoid, and Topographic Data Incorporating Seismic Constraints
Abstract
Investigation of deep crustal and lithospheric structures is essential to understand the nature of geodynamical processes beneath the Himalaya and Tibetan plateau of the India‐Eurasia collision zone. Our density cross sections across the Himalaya‐Eurasia collision zone using integrated 2‐D modeling of gravity, topography, and geoid data incorporating constraints from seismic information supports the above contention. Analysis of gravity, geoid, and elevation data over the interior of the Tibetan plateau predicts complete isostatic compensation, whereas margins of the plateau, having large topographic gradients, show lack of isostatic compensation as the Airy Moho differs from flexural Moho and seismic Moho beneath the Himalaya. Our 2‐D modeled lithospheric cross sections show thick crust (~75 km) and thick lithosphere (~240 km) beneath the Himalayas and southern Tibetan plateau and relatively thin crust (~60 km) and thin lithosphere (~140 km) beneath the northern Tibetan plateau. Therefore, depth of lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary (LAB) mimics the Moho relief. Thinner crust and thin lithosphere under northern Tibetan plateau suggest the importance of the mantle isostasy where the temperature is anomalously high. This corroborates with the presence of recent potassic volcanism, inefficient Sn propagation, east and southeast oriented global positioning system displacements, and large shear wave splitting anisotropy (>2 s). Excellent correlation between effective elastic thic…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since collisional orogens are characterised by a thicker lithosphere, they are likely less sensitive to mantle dynamics than the southern Patagonian Andes.
“Since these collisional orogens are characterised by a thicker lithosphere (Geissler et al., 2010;Ravikumar et al., 2020), they are likely less sensitive to mantle dynamics than the southern Patagonian Andes.”
From Fast uplift in the southern Patagonian Andes due to long- and short-term deglaciation and the asthenospheric window underneath (2024) · cites this paper as Ravikumar et al., 2020
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 152 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Ravikumar, M., Singh, B., Pavan Kumar, V., Satyakumar, A. V., Ramesh, D. S., & Tiwari, V. M.
- Affiliations
- National Geophysical Research Institute (IN)
- CSIR‐National Geophysical Research Institute (CSIR‐NGRI) Hyderabad India
- Indian Institute of Geomagnetism (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Ravikumar, M.
- Venue
- Tectonics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0278-7407 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9194
- OpenAlex
- W3088078884
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 152
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tectonics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Keywords
- lithospheric density structure, effective elastic thickness, Himalaya, Tibetan Plateau, India-Asia collision, gravity inversion, geoid, topography, Airy isostasy, flexural isostasy, Moho depth, lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, crustal thickness, mantle temperature anomalies, mantle flow, shear wave splitting, GPS displacement, lithospheric deformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review