Cited by 37Geological and Geophysical Studiesearthquake and tectonic studiesGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Lithospheric Density Structure and Effective Elastic Thickness Beneath Himalaya and Tibetan Plateau: Inference From the Integrated Analysis of Gravity, Geoid, and Topographic Data Incorporating Seismic Constraints

Ravikumar, M., Singh, B., Pavan Kumar, V., Satyakumar, A. V., Ramesh, D. S., Tiwari, V. M.·2020·Tectonics

Abstract

Investigation of deep crustal and lithospheric structures is essential to understand the nature of geodynamical processes beneath the Himalaya and Tibetan plateau of the India‐Eurasia collision zone. Our density cross sections across the Himalaya‐Eurasia collision zone using integrated 2‐D modeling of gravity, topography, and geoid data incorporating constraints from seismic information supports the above contention. Analysis of gravity, geoid, and elevation data over the interior of the Tibetan plateau predicts complete isostatic compensation, whereas margins of the plateau, having large topographic gradients, show lack of isostatic compensation as the Airy Moho differs from flexural Moho and seismic Moho beneath the Himalaya. Our 2‐D modeled lithospheric cross sections show thick crust (~75 km) and thick lithosphere (~240 km) beneath the Himalayas and southern Tibetan plateau and relatively thin crust (~60 km) and thin lithosphere (~140 km) beneath the northern Tibetan plateau. Therefore, depth of lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary (LAB) mimics the Moho relief. Thinner crust and thin lithosphere under northern Tibetan plateau suggest the importance of the mantle isostasy where the temperature is anomalously high. This corroborates with the presence of recent potassic volcanism, inefficient Sn propagation, east and southeast oriented global positioning system displacements, and large shear wave splitting anisotropy (>2 s). Excellent correlation between effective elastic thic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2020tc006219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 152 · Cited by 37

Authors
Ravikumar, M., Singh, B., Pavan Kumar, V., Satyakumar, A. V., Ramesh, D. S., & Tiwari, V. M.
Affiliations
  • National Geophysical Research Institute (IN)
  • CSIR‐National Geophysical Research Institute (CSIR‐NGRI) Hyderabad India
  • Indian Institute of Geomagnetism (IN)
Corresponding author
Ravikumar, M.
Venue
Tectonics
Published
2020-10
Volume
39
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0278-7407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9194
OpenAlex
W3088078884
Cited by
37
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tectonics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
lithospheric density structure, effective elastic thickness, Himalaya, Tibetan Plateau, India-Asia collision, gravity inversion, geoid, topography, Airy isostasy, flexural isostasy, Moho depth, lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, crustal thickness, mantle temperature anomalies, mantle flow, shear wave splitting, GPS displacement, lithospheric deformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review