Cited by 19Precipitation Measurement and AnalysisMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingHydrological Forecasting Using AI

Automatic Quality Control of Crowdsourced Rainfall Data With Multiple Noises: A Machine Learning Approach

Open access
Niu, Geng, Yang, Pan, Zheng, Yi, Cai, Ximing, Qin, Huapeng·2021·Water Resources Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In geophysics, crowdsourcing is an emerging nontraditional environmental monitoring approach that supports data acquisition from individual citizens. However, because of the involvement of undertrained citizens and imprecise low‐cost sensors, crowdsourced data applications suffer from different types of noises that can deteriorate the overall monitoring accuracy. In this study, we propose a machine learning approach for automatic crowdsourced data quality control (CSQC) that detects and removes noisy data inputs in spatially and temporally discrete crowdsourced observations coming from both fixed‐point sensors (e.g., surveillance cameras) and moving sensors (e.g., moving cars/pedestrians). We design a set of features from original and interpolated rainfall data and use them to train and test the CSQC models using both supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms. The performances of the CSQC models under various scenarios assuming no retraining are also tested (hereafter referred to as transferability). The results based on synthetic but realistic data show that the CSQC models can significantly reduce the overall rainfall estimate errors. Under the stationary assumption, the CSQC models based on both supervised and unsupervised algorithms perform well in noisy data identification and overall rainfall estimation error reduction; however, if the model is transferred to other cities with different rainfall patterns or noise compositions (without retraining), supervised multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) show the best performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2020wr029121

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning algorithms such as decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, and isolation forests have been applied to classify outliers, significantly improving detection accuracy of anomalous precipitation data.

    “For example, machine learning algorithms such as decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, and isolation forests have been applied to classify outliers, significantly improving the detection accuracy of anomalous precipitation data [36][37][38][39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niu, G., Yang, P., Zheng, Y., Cai, X., & Qin, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Pan
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2021-11
Volume
57
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W3206993198
Cited by
19
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Keywords
rainfall estimation, noise detection, citizen science, low-cost sensors, moving sensors, surveillance cameras, transferability, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, multilayer perceptron, synthetic data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review