Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols
Abstract
Stratospheric aerosol injection is one of the most widely studied solar radiation modification methods to reduce some effects of anthropogenic warming. We perform idealized simulations to analyze climate response to different latitudinal and altitudinal distributions of additional stratospheric sulphate aerosols. We analyze climate response to both large volcanic‐size aerosols that are representative of sulphate aerosols which form when SO 2 is injected into the stratosphere by major volcanic eruptions or by proposed stratospheric sulphate aerosol geoengineering option, and small background‐size aerosols which are present in the stratosphere during quiescent periods with no major volcanic eruptions. Our simulations show that under the climate state with doubled atmospheric CO 2, for the same total mass, independent of size‐distributions, aerosols concentrated at higher latitudes produce less negative effective radiative forcing but larger surface cooling as a result of larger forcing efficacy. For the same latitudinal distribution, small background‐size aerosols added at lower altitudes cause larger surface cooling as a result of hygroscopic growth that increases scattering of sunlight. In contrast, large volcanic‐size aerosols added at lower altitudes cause smaller surface cooling than at higher altitudes as a result of enhanced stratospheric heating and associated water vapor feedback that enhance absorption of solar and terrestrial radiation. For both background‐size and volcanic‐size aerosols, asymmetric distributions about the equator induce substantial cross‐equatorial energy transport, causing the Intertropical Convergence Zone to move to the warmer hemisphere with less aerosol loading. Our study helps to understand the climate consequences of different spatial patterns and size distributions of stratospheric aerosol perturbation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Altitude also impacts relative humidity conditions and the degree of hygroscopic growth, which could affect aqueous aerosol sizes, compositions and resulting optical properties, though this is highly dependent on the size of aerosol injected.
“Altitude also impacts relative humidity conditions and the degree of hygroscopic growth, which could affect aqueous aerosol sizes, compositions and resulting optical properties23, though this is highly dependent on the size of aerosol injected24.”
From Engineering and logistical concerns add practical limitations to stratospheric aerosol injection strategies (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Asymmetric stratospheric aerosol injection scenarios exist in the literature and are studied in this paper.
“Such asymmetric scenarios do exist in literature and are studied here (18,24,30,51,53,] 55,85,109,115,123,124,] 132–134,137,159,164,165,223).”
From Engineering and logistical concerns add practical limitations to stratospheric aerosol injection strategies (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Zhao, M., Cao, L., Bala, G., & Duan, L.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cao, Long
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2021-12-14
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 24
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-897X
- 2169-8996
- OpenAlex
- W4200119185
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41975103)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Keywords
- stratospheric sulfate aerosols, solar geoengineering, latitudinal distribution, altitudinal distribution, aerosol size distribution, volcanic aerosols, effective radiative forcing, hygroscopic growth, stratospheric heating, water vapor feedback, Intertropical Convergence Zone, surface cooling, CO2 doubling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review