Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation

Open access
Golaz, Jean‐Christophe, Van Roekel, Luke P., Zheng, Xue, Roberts, Andrew F., Wolfe, Jonathan D., Lin, Wuyin, Bradley, Andrew M., Tang, Qi, Maltrud, Mathew E., Forsyth, Ryan M., Zhang, Chengzhu, Zhou, Tian, Zhang, Kai, Zender, Charles S., Wu, Mingxuan, Wang, Hailong, Turner, Adrian K., Singh, Balwinder, Richter, Jadwiga H., Qin, Yi, Petersen, Mark R., Mametjanov, Azamat, Ma, Po‐Lun, Larson, Vincent E., Krishna, Jayesh, Keen, Noel D., Jeffery, Nicole, Hunke, Elizabeth C., Hannah, Walter M., Guba, Oksana, Griffin, Brian M., Feng, Yan, Engwirda, Darren, Di Vittorio, Alan V., Dang, Cheng, Conlon, LeAnn M., Chen, Chih‐Chieh‐Jack, Brunke, Michael A., Bisht, Gautam, Benedict, James J., Asay‐Davis, Xylar S., Zhang, Yuying, Zhang, Meng, Zeng, Xubin, Xie, Shaocheng, Wolfram, Phillip J., Vo, Tom, Veneziani, Milena, Tesfa, Teklu K., Sreepathi, Sarat, Salinger, Andrew G., Reeves Eyre, J. E. Jack, Prather, Michael J., Mahajan, Salil, Li, Qing, Jones, Philip W., Jacob, Robert L., Huebler, Gunther W., Huang, Xianglei, Hillman, Benjamin R., Harrop, Bryce E., Foucar, James G., Fang, Yilin, Comeau, Darin S., Caldwell, Peter M., Bartoletti, Tony, Balaguru, Karthik, Taylor, Mark A., McCoy, Renata B., Leung, L. Ruby, Bader, David C.·2022·Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Abstract

This work documents version two of the Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM). E3SMv2 is a significant evolution from its predecessor E3SMv1, resulting in a model that is nearly twice as fast and with a simulated climate that is improved in many metrics. We describe the physical climate model in its lower horizontal resolution configuration consisting of 110 km atmosphere, 165 km land, 0.5° river routing model, and an ocean and sea ice with mesh spacing varying between 60 km in the mid‐latitudes and 30 km at the equator and poles. The model performance is evaluated with Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima simulations augmented with historical simulations as well as simulations to evaluate impacts of different forcing agents. The simulated climate has many realistic features of the climate system, with notable improvements in clouds and precipitation compared to E3SMv1. E3SMv1 suffered from an excessively high equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 5.3 K. In E3SMv2, ECS is reduced to 4.0 K which is now within the plausible range based on a recent World Climate Research Program assessment. However, a number of important biases remain including a weak Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, deficiencies in the characteristics and spectral distribution of tropical atmospheric variability, and a significant underestimation of the observed warming in the second half of the historical period. An analysis of single‐forcing simulations indicates that correcting the historical temperature bias would require a substantial reduction in the magnitude of the aerosol‐related forcing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2022ms003156

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 148 references

Metadata

Authors
Golaz, J., Van Roekel, L. P., Zheng, X., Roberts, A. F., Wolfe, J. D., Lin, W., Bradley, A. M., Tang, Q., Maltrud, M. E., Forsyth, R. M., Zhang, C., Zhou, T., Zhang, K., Zender, C. S., Wu, M., Wang, H., Turner, A. K., Singh, B., Richter, J. H., Qin, Y., Petersen, M. R., Mametjanov, A., Ma, P., Larson, V. E., Krishna, J., Keen, N. D., Jeffery, N., Hunke, E. C., Hannah, W. M., Guba, O., Griffin, B. M., Feng, Y., Engwirda, D., Di Vittorio, A. V., Dang, C., Conlon, L. M., Chen, C., Brunke, M. A., Bisht, G., Benedict, J. J., Asay‐Davis, X. S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Zeng, X., Xie, S., Wolfram, P. J., Vo, T., Veneziani, M., Tesfa, T. K., Sreepathi, S., Salinger, A. G., Reeves Eyre, J. E. J., Prather, M. J., Mahajan, S., Li, Q., Jones, P. W., Jacob, R. L., Huebler, G. W., Huang, X., Hillman, B. R., Harrop, B. E., Foucar, J. G., Fang, Y., Comeau, D. S., Caldwell, P. M., Bartoletti, T., Balaguru, K., Taylor, M. A., McCoy, R. B., Leung, L. R., & Bader, D. C.
Venue
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2022-12
Volume
14
Issue
12
ISSN
1942-2466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307895189
Cited by
371
References
148
FWCI
30.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2022ms003156
The paper
Golaz, J., Van Roekel, L. P., Zheng, X., Roberts, A. F., Wolfe, J. D., Lin, W., Bradley, A. M., Tang, Q., Maltrud, M. E., Forsyth, R. M., Zhang, C., Zhou, T., Zhang, K., Zender, C. S., Wu, M., Wang, H., Turner, A. K., Singh, B., Richter, J. H., . . . Bader, D. C. (2022). The DOE E3SM Model Version 2: Overview of the Physical Model and Initial Model Evaluation. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ms003156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.