The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Debris Flow Warning via Machine Learning Feature Reduction and Model Selection
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The advent of machine learning has significantly improved the accuracy of identifying mass movements through the seismic waves they generate, making it possible to implement real‐time early warning systems for debris flows. However, we lack a profound understanding of the effective seismic features and the limitations of different machine learning models. In this work, we investigate eighty seismic features and three machine learning models for single‐station‐based binary debris flow classification and multi‐station‐based warning tasks. These seismic features, derived from physical and statistical knowledge of impact sources, are grouped into five sets: Benford's law, waveform, spectra, spectrogram, and network. The machine learning models belong to two families: two ensemble models, Random Forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost); one recurrent neural network model, Long Short‐Term Memory (LSTM). We analyzed feature importance from the ensemble models and found that the number and even the types of seismic features are not critical for training an effective binary classifier for debris flow. When using models designed to capture patterns in sequential data rather than focusing on information only in one given window, using the LSTM does not significantly improve the performance of binary debris flow classification task over Random Forest and XGBoost. For the multi‐station‐based debris flow warning task, the LSTM model predicts debris flow probability more consistently and provides longer warning times. Our proposed framework simplifies machine learning‐driven debris flow classification and lays the foundation for affordable seismic signal‐driven early warning using a sparse seismic network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Feature selection for machine learning classification problems: a recent overview
Kotsiantis, S. B. (2011) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-011-9230-1 · Cited by 99
RetractedBreiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python
Seabold, S., & Perktold, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference · doi:10.25080/majora-92bf1922-011 · Cited by 6,465
Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network
Sherstinsky, A. (2020) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306 · Cited by 5,680
On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and practice
Yang, L., & Shami, A. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061 · Cited by 3,232
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Aki K., 2002, Quantitative seismology
- Cutler A., 2012, Random forests, 157
- Petley D., 2023, The devastating 17 July 2023 debris flow at Quetame in Colombia, American Geophysical Union Blogosphere
- Petley D., 2024, The possible causes of the deadly 21 June 2024 SORTE debris flow in Switzerland, Eos American Geophysical Union
Cited by
Real-Time Railway Hazard Detection Using Distributed Acoustic Sensing and Hybrid Ensemble Learning
Yürekli, Y., Özarpa, C., & Avcı, İ. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25133992 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Q., Tang, H., Hibert, C., Chmiel, M., Walter, F., Dietze, M., & Turowski, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Qi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2025-04
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2169-9003 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-9011
- OpenAlex
- W4409831609
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (SKLGP2023K003)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (42120104002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Seismology and Earthquake Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
- Keywords
- debris flow early warning, seismic signals, machine learning model selection, Benford's law, seismic spectra, spectrogram, sparse seismic networks, feature importance, random forest, XGBoost, LSTM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing Debris Flow Warning via Machine Learning Feature Reduction and Model Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2024jf008094
- The paper
- Zhou, Q., Tang, H., Hibert, C., Chmiel, M., Walter, F., Dietze, M., & Turowski, J. M. (2025). Enhancing Debris Flow Warning via Machine Learning Feature Reduction and Model Selection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jf008094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.