Cited by 1Ocean Acidification Effects and ResponsesMarine and coastal ecosystemsClimate Change and Geoengineering

Lethal by Design? Resolving Differences Between Experimental and Real‐World Alkalinity Perturbations in Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement

Open access
Bach, Lennart T., Tyka, Michael D., Wang, Bin, Fennel, Katja·2026·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) aims to mitigate climate change by increasing the chemical capacity of seawater to store anthropogenic CO 2 . OAE can be implemented through multiple pathways, each of which intentionally modifies marine carbonate chemistry through increases in total alkalinity (TA). Experimental research has only recently begun to assess how such TA perturbations (ΔTA) and associated carbonate chemistry changes affect ocean ecosystems. Meaningful assessments need context on how ΔTA‐induced by different OAE pathways would evolve over time and in magnitude. Here, we use a dilution equation, a regional model, and a global model to explore how marine organisms would be exposed to ΔTA under realistic constraints. We find that a more extreme ΔTA of>1,000 μmol kg −1 , a perturbation common in OAE experiments, only occurs for minutes in a minuscule fraction of the OAE‐perturbed seawater volume. In contrast, ΔTA between 1 and 100 μmol kg −1 is a ubiquitous perturbation range for OAE under real‐world constraints, yet are not commonly in focus of environmental OAE assessments. These results suggest that there is a disconnect between real‐world ΔTA that can plausibly be invoked by OAE and the experimental ΔTA range frequently used in the environmental OAE assessment. While “unrealistic” ΔTA can provide mechanistic insights into an organism or ecosystem response to carbonate chemistry changes, they can also cause overestimation of OAE effects, if the unrealistic ΔTA is…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2025jc023598

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under field conditions, alkalinity-enriched seawater from point sources would be progressively diluted following release, reducing carbonate chemistry perturbations relative to those imposed in enclosed microcosms.

    “It is also important to consider that, under field conditions, alkalinity-enriched seawater from point sources would be progressively diluted following release, reducing carbonate chemistry perturbations relative to those imposed in enclosed microcosms (Bach et al., 2026).”

    From Biogeochemical responses to ocean alkalinity enhancement in the North China Sea (2026) · cites this paper as Bach et al., 2026

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bach, L. T., Tyka, M. D., Wang, B., & Fennel, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bach, Lennart T.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
2026-08
Volume
131
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2169-9275 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-9291
OpenAlex
W7202247176
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
ocean alkalinity enhancement, seawater carbonate chemistry, CO2 sequestration, marine ecosystem impacts, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review