The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system
Abstract
The successive versions (EC1, EC2, and EC3) of the radiation scheme used in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) operational model, including the version which became operational on May 2, 1989, are reviewed and their results are compared to results of more detailed radiation models made available thanks to the Intercomparison of Radiation Codes Used in Climate Models (ICRCCM) program. For clear‐sky conditions, the shortwave H 2 O absorptivity is overestimated in EC1‐EC2, which leads to too large shortwave atmospheric absorption (by up to 20%) and too small downward shortwave radiation at the surface (by 5–10%). EC1 and EC2 both significantly underestimate the longwave radiative cooling, with main errors in the lower troposphere with EC1, and between 700 and 300 hPa with EC2. Therefore EC1 and, to a smaller extent, EC2 underestimate the outgoing longwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere. In cloudy conditions, EC1 shows an exaggerated sensitivity to small amounts of scatterer, a problem corrected in EC2. Due an unrealistic model cloud embedded in EC1‐EC2, these schemes cannot properly represent both the shortwave planetary albedo and outgoing longwave radiation for realistic cloud liquid water contents. EC3 corrects most of these deficiencies and gives results in better agreement with those of more detailed models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., et al. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.3803 · Cited by 31,882
Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN/WCRP): New Precision Radiometry for Climate Research
Ohmura, A., Gilgen, H., Hegner, H., Müller, G., Wild, M., Dutton, E. G., Forgan, B., Fröhlich, C., Philipona, R., Heimo, A., et al. (1998) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<2115:bsrnbw>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 965
Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane
LELIEVELD, J., CRUTZEN, P. J., & DENTENER, F. J. (1998) · Tellus B · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.1998.t01-1-00002.x · Cited by 733
Evaluation and model impacts of alternative boundary-layer height formulations
Vogelezang, D. H. P., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (1996) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/bf02430331 · Cited by 561
Hourdin, F., Foujols, M.-A., Codron, F., Guemas, V., Dufresne, J.-L., Bony, S., Denvil, S., Guez, L., Lott, F., Ghattas, J., et al. (2013) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1411-3 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Morcrette, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1991-05-20
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- D5
- Pages
- 9121-9132
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045334569
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/89jd01597
- The paper
- Morcrette, J. (1991). Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/89jd01597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.