Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The continental crustal age distribution: Methods of determining mantle separation ages from Sm‐Nd isotopic data and application to the southwestern United States

DePaolo, D. J., Linn, A. M., Schubert, G.·1991·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Samarium‐neodymium isotope systematics provide a means of determining the age of the continental crust, where ”age“ refers to the amount of time the crustal rock material has been isolated from the convecting mantle. This age is referred to as the Sm‐Nd model age or the mantle separation age. Systematic analysis of rocks from the continents can be used to determine the age distribution by mass in the continents; this is a unique record of the thermal and chemical evolution of Earth over almost 4 b.y. The establishment of mantle separation ages for crustal rock reservoirs requires precise geochronological information typically provided by U‐Pb isotopic measurements of zircon, plus models for (1) Nd isotopic evolution in the mantle source of continental crust, (2) Nd isotopic evolution of crustal reservoirs subsequent to formation, (3) petrogenesis of certain types of granitic rocks in the crust, (4) the mechanisms of formation of hybrid crust (mixtures of material newly differentiated from the mantle with material derived from older crust), and (5) the evolution of the lower parts of the continental crust during continental margin magmatism and intracontinental extension. Methods are presented for treating isotopic data on continental rock materials to obtain meaningful mantle separation ages. The greatest uncertainties come from a lack of adequate information on lower crustal processes and composition. The methods are applied to the Precambrian and Mesozoic rocks of the southwestern United States to produce a mass‐age distribution for the region, which represents 1% of the global continental mass. The results suggest episodic crustal growth, with short growth periods at circa 2.8, 1.8, and 0.1 Ga. About 90% of the crust was formed by 1.8 Ga, the remaining 10% was added in the Phanerozoic. The mean age of this section of continent is determined to be 1.84 Ga. Almost all of the Phanerozoic additions occur in areas where there was no preexisting continental basement; Mesozoic magmatic additions account for only about 2% of the crustal mass in the area underlain by Precambrian basement. In the region of post‐Precambrian continental growth, the regions farthest from the Precambrian continental edge are composed of mostly (>85%) of material newly differentiated from the mantle. Adjacent to the Precambrian continental edge the new crust is typically composed about 50% of material newly differentiated from the mantle and 50% of old crustal material. There is no correlation between crustal thickness and the crust formation age in the area studied; the age‐area and age‐mass curves are nearly identical.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/90jb02219

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
DePaolo, D. J., Linn, A. M., & Schubert, G.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1991-02-10
Volume
96
Issue
B2
Pages
2071-2088
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170551182
Cited by
476
References
0
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The continental crustal age distribution: Methods of determining mantle separation ages from Sm‐Nd isotopic data and application to the southwestern United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/90jb02219
The paper
DePaolo, D. J., Linn, A. M., & Schubert, G. (1991). The continental crustal age distribution: Methods of determining mantle separation ages from Sm‐Nd isotopic data and application to the southwestern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/90jb02219

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.