The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monitoring the Mt. Pinatubo aerosol layer with NOAA/11 AVHRR data
Abstract
The NOAA/NESDIS operational aerosol optical thickness product has provided an exceptional view of the development of the Mt. Pinatubo stratospheric aerosol layer. The product is derived from reflected solar radiation measurements of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer onboard the NOAA/11 polar orbiting environmental satellite. The greater the optical thickness, the greater the amount of reflected solar radiation. Daily and weekly composites of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at a wavelength of 0.5 micrometers have been analyzed to monitor the spatial and temporal variability of the aerosol layer and its optical thickness since the major eruption of Mt. Pinatubo on June 15, 1991. These analyses show that: the volcanic aerosol layer circled the Earth in 21 days; there are inhomogeneities in the layer that seem to remain after over two months of circling the Earth; using an AOT of 0.1 to define the layer, it covered about 42% of the Earth's surface area after two months, over twice the area covered by the El Chichon aerosol layer two months after its eruption; the layer is confined to the latitude zone 20S to 30N, with occasional patches seen at somewhat higher latitudes; the largest mean optical thickness of the layer was 0.31, occurring on August 23rd; the mass of SO 2 required to produce this aerosol optical thickness is 13.6 megatons; and, the globally averaged net radiation at the top of the atmosphere may be reduced by about 2.5 Wm−2 (cooling effect of at least 0.5°C) once the aerosol is distributed globally over the next two to four years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., & Warren, S. G. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326655a0 · Cited by 4,305
Cited by
Volcanic eruptions and climate
Robock, A. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1998rg000054 · Cited by 2,806
Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) instrument description and experiment overview
Diner, D. J., Beckert, J. C., Reilly, T. H., Bruegge, C. J., Conel, J. E., Kahn, R. A., Martonchik, J. V., Ackerman, T. P., Davies, R., Gerstl, S. A. W., et al. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.700992 · Cited by 1,050
SAGE II measurements of early Pinatubo aerosols
McCormick, M. P., & Veiga, R. E. (1992) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/91gl02790 · Cited by 369
Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China
Piao, S., Fang, J., Zhou, L., Zhu, B., Tan, K., & Tao, S. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002274 · Cited by 349
The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone
Heckendorn, P., Weisenstein, D., Fueglistaler, S., Luo, B. P., Rozanov, E., Schraner, M., Thomason, L. W., & Peter, T. (2009) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045108 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Stowe, L. L., Carey, R. M., & Pellegrino, P. P.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-01-24
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-162
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2042731068
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring the Mt. Pinatubo aerosol layer with NOAA/11 AVHRR data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91gl02958
- The paper
- Stowe, L. L., Carey, R. M., & Pellegrino, P. P. (1992). Monitoring the Mt. Pinatubo aerosol layer with NOAA/11 AVHRR data. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl02958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.