The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The spreading rate dependence of three‐dimensional mid‐ocean ridge gravity structure
Abstract
We analyze over 1300 km of high resolution along‐axis gravity profiles at ridges with half‐spreading rates ranging from 1.2 to 5.5 cm/yr. The results show consistently higher along‐axis gradients of mantle Bouguer anomaly at the slow‐spreading Mid‐Atlantic Ridge (MAR) (0.3–1.2 mgal/km) than at the intermediate‐ to fast‐spreading Cocos‐Nazca Ridge and East Pacific Rise (EPR) (0.1–0.2 mgal/km). The regional peak‐to‐trough amplitude of mantle Bouguer anomaly is also greater along the MAR (30–60 mgal) than the Cocos‐Nazca Ridge and the EPR (10–20 mgal). With increasing spreading rate, the regional peak‐to‐trough amplitude of axial seafloor depth decreases from 1000–1700 m to 200–700 m. 3‐D numerical experiments suggest that mantle contributions to the gravity can be significant only near large‐offset transforms. At the more commonly observed non‐transform offsets, gravity anomalies will reflect crustal thickness variations. The along‐axis gravity data thus indicate that the amplitude of along‐axis crustal thickness variation decreases with increasing spreading rate. We propose that this spreading rate dependent crustal accretion style may originate in the mantle: finite‐amplitude mantle upwelling is intrinsically plume‐like (3‐D) beneath a slow‐spreading ridge but more sheet‐like (2‐D) beneath a fast‐spreading ridge. Such a transition in mantle upwelling may occur if the relative importance of passive upwelling over buoyant upwelling increases with increasing spreading rate. Small amplitude 3‐D upwellings may occur at a fast‐spreading ridge, but their effects on crustal thickness variations will be significantly reduced by along‐axis melt flows along a persistent low‐viscosity crustal magma chamber. In contrast, the large crustal thickness variations due to 3‐D mantle upwellings will be maintained at a slow‐spreading ridge because less along‐axis melt flows can occur in the colder and more rigid crust there.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Magmatic and amagmatic seafloor generation at the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge, Arctic Ocean
Michael, P. J., Langmuir, C. H., Dick, H. J. B., Snow, J. E., Goldstein, S. L., Graham, D. W., Lehnert, K., Kurras, G., Jokat, W., Mühe, R., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01704 · Cited by 433
Variation with spreading rate of oceanic crustal thickness and geochemistry
Bown, J. W., & White, R. S. (1994) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(94)90082-5 · Cited by 399
Oceanic crustal thickness versus spreading rate
Chen, Y. J. (1992) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/92gl00161 · Cited by 213
Evidence from the Oman ophiolite for active mantle upwelling beneath a fast-spreading ridge
Nicolas, A., Boudier, F., & Ildefonse, B. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370051a0 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, J., & Morgan, J. P.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-01-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-16
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W3103104081
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spreading rate dependence of three‐dimensional mid‐ocean ridge gravity structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91gl03041
- The paper
- Lin, J., & Morgan, J. P. (1992). The spreading rate dependence of three‐dimensional mid‐ocean ridge gravity structure. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl03041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.