The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paleointensity of the geomagnetic field during the last 80,000 years
Open accessAbstract
High‐resolution records of the relative paleointensity of the geomagnetic field have been obtained from five marine cores. Three duplicate records were used to estimate the regional coherency of the data within a single area (Tyrrhrenian Sea) while the two others document the field variations in the eastern Mediterranean and the southern Indian Ocean. Careful investigations of distinct rock magnetic parameters have established the downcore uniformity of the sediments in terms of magnetic mineralogy and grain sizes. The time‐depth control was provided by oxygen isotopes, and small‐scale variations in the deposition rates were constrained by means of tephrachronology. The synthetic curve calculated from the Mediterranean records provides a continuous record of the intensity variations during the last 80,000 years (80 kyr), which correlates well with the sparse volcanic data available for the period 0–40 kyr. The fact that identical behavior is seen in both data sets and that they also compare quite well with results from a core collected in the Pacific Ocean establishes the truly dipolar character of these variations. The dipole field moment is characterized by large‐scale changes as shown by the existence of pronounced drops (at 39 and 60 kyr) alternating with periods of higher intensity. The record suggests a periodic nature for these intensity variations; however, the period studied is not sufficiently long to state this conclusively. These results demonstrate the potential of sediments for such studies and constitute a first step towards obtaining a global paleointensity record over a long period of time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coe, R. S., Grommé, S., & Mankinen, E. A. (1978) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb083ib04p01740 · Cited by 774
Cited by
Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: theory and application
Gosse, J. C., & Phillips, F. M. (2001) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0277-3791(00)00171-2 · Cited by 2,051
Global changes in intensity of the Earth's magnetic field during the past 800 kyr
Guyodo, Y., & Valet, J.-P. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20420 · Cited by 605
Self-citationESTIMATING RATES OF DENUDATION USING COSMOGENIC ISOTOPE ABUNDANCES IN SEDIMENT
BIERMAN, P., & STEIG, E. J. (1996) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9837(199602)21:2<125::aid-esp511>3.0.co;2-8 · Cited by 434
Geomagnetic field intensity and reversals during the past four million years
Valet, J.-P., & Meynadier, L. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366234a0 · Cited by 405
Self-citationSynchronous Radiocarbon and Climate Shifts During the Last Deglaciation
Hughen, K. A., Southon, J. R., Lehman, S. J., & Overpeck, J. T. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5498.1951 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Tric, E., Valet, J., Tucholka, P., Paterne, M., Labeyrie, L., Guichard, F., Tauxe, L., & Fontugne, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-06-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- B6
- Pages
- 9337-9351
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052958334
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paleointensity of the geomagnetic field during the last 80,000 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jb01620
- The paper
- Tric, E., Valet, J., Tucholka, P., Paterne, M., Labeyrie, L., Guichard, F., Tauxe, L., & Fontugne, M. (1992). Paleointensity of the geomagnetic field during the last 80,000 years. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jb01620
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.