Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical model of source region of subduction zone volcanics

Open access
Davies, J. Huw, Stevenson, D. J.·1992·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

The thermal structure of a generic subduction zone is investigated to elucidate the source region of subduction zone volcanics. The steady state thermal field is evaluated for a model subduction zone where the plates are prescribed by kinematic boundary conditions, such that the subducting slab induces a flow in the mantle wedge. The resulting model suggests that the oceanic crust of the downgoing slab is not melted extensively, if at all, and hence is not the source of subduction zone magmatism (with the possible exception of the special case of very young oceanic crust). The temperature in the mantle wedge is high enough to produce melting at the amphibole‐buffered peridotite solidus. It is proposed that the combination of vertical motion of water as a free phase and the transport of hydrous phases (e.g., amphiboles) by the slab‐induced mantle wedge flow lead to the net transport of water being horizontal, across the mantle wedge from the slab. Provided the subducting oceanic crust enters the asthenosphere at a velocity > 6(±2) cm/yr, the mantle wedge will be hot enough at the limit of the lateral water transport mechanism to generate melting at the amphibole‐buffered solidus. The model was then extended to include the effect of localized sources of buoyancy (melt, residue, etc.) as a stationary body force, to investigate the possibility of reversing the slab‐induced flow. Best estimates of the buoyancy sources and appropriate viscosity in the wedge suggest that there is likely to be only a weak modulation of the slab‐induced flow unless the slab and wedge are locally decoupled, for instance by shear heating, the presence of water, or dehydration/hydration reactions. If there is decoupling, then it is possible for there to be an appreciable reversal of the slab‐induced flow. Such an appreciable reversal of flow, if it persists, leads to cooling of the mantle wedge. Hence flow reversal cannot be a steady state mechanism. Instead it would lead to a cycle in the melting with a period of O(1 m.y.). The time dependence of a model with appreciable flow reversal would be reinforced by the need to clear the wedge of infertile material.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91jb02571

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Davies, J. H., & Stevenson, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1992-02-10
Volume
97
Issue
B2
Pages
2037-2070
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980796709
Cited by
593
References
2
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical model of source region of subduction zone volcanics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jb02571
The paper
Davies, J. H., & Stevenson, D. J. (1992). Physical model of source region of subduction zone volcanics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jb02571

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.