Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A mechanism for the formation of methane hydrate and seafloor bottom‐simulating reflectors by vertical fluid expulsion

Hyndman, Roy D., Davis, Earl E.·1992·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Bottom‐simulating reflectors (BSR) are observed commonly at a depth of several hundred meters below the seafloor in continental margin sedimentary sections that have undergone recent tectonic consolidation or rapid accumulation. They are believed to correspond to the deepest level at which methane hydrate (clathrate) is stable. We present a model in which BSR hydrate layers are formed through the removal of methane from upward moving pore fluids as they pass into the hydrate stability field. In this model, most of the methane is generated below the level of hydrate stability, but not at depths sufficient for significant thermogenic production; the methane is primarily biogenic in origin. The model requires either a mechanism to remove dissolved methane from the pore fluids or disseminated free gas carried upward with the pore fluid. The model accounts for the evidence that the hydrate is concentrated in a layer at the base of the stability field, for the source of the large amount of methane contained in the hydrate, and for BSRs being common only in special environments. Strong upward fluid expulsion into the hydrate stability field does not occur in normal sediment depositional regimes, so BSRs are uncommon. Upward fluid expulsion does occur as a result of tectonic thickening and loading in subduction zone accretionary wedges and in areas where rapid deposition results in initial undercconsolidation. In these areas hydrate BSRs are common. The most poorly quantified aspect of the model is the efficiency with which methane is removed and hydrate is formed as pore fluids pass into the hydrate stability field. The critical boundary in the phase diagram between the fluid‐plus‐hydrate and fluid‐only fields is not well constrained. However, the amount of methane required to form the hydrate and limited data on methane concentrations in pore fluids from deep‐sea boreholes suggest very efficient removal of methane from rising fluid that may contain less than the amount required for free gas production. In most fluid expulsion regimes, the quantity of fluid moved upward to the seafloor is great enough to continually remove the excess chloride and the residue of isotope fractionation resulting from hydrate formation. Thus, as observed in borehole data, there are no large chloride or isotope anomalies remaining in the local pore fluids. The differences in the concentration of methane and probably of CO 2 in the pore fluid above and below the base of the stability field may have a significant influence on early sediment diagenetic reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91jb03061

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 404

Metadata

Authors
Hyndman, R. D., & Davis, E. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1992-05-10
Volume
97
Issue
B5
Pages
7025-7041
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160126448
Cited by
404
References
0
FWCI
19.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mechanism for the formation of methane hydrate and seafloor bottom‐simulating reflectors by vertical fluid expulsion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jb03061
The paper
Hyndman, R. D., & Davis, E. E. (1992). A mechanism for the formation of methane hydrate and seafloor bottom‐simulating reflectors by vertical fluid expulsion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jb03061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.