Measurements of nitrogen oxides at Barrow, Alaska during spring: Evidence for regional and northern hemispheric sources of pollution
Abstract
Total reactive nitrogen oxide (NOy) and NO were measured at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Monitoring for Climatic Change (NOAA GMCC) site at Barrow, Alaska, for 5 weeks during the spring of 1989. The data demonstrate the existence of a complex array of pollution sources which influence arctic air chemistry. During periods when 10‐day back‐trajectories indicated southerly flow, median NOy concentrations ranged from 284 to 467 ppt. When the 10‐day back‐trajectories originated in the Arctic, median NOy, concentrations ranged from 617 to 734 ppt, providing evidence for the long‐range transport of pollutants to the Arctic known as “arctic haze.” The NOy concentrations observed during the spring background periods are significantly higher than previous measurements of NOy at Barrow taken during summer, regardless of where the air mass originated. These observations provide evidence for a greatly increased NOy lifetime during the colder months over a large region of the background troposphere as well as the presence of much higher NOy concentrations in the Arctic. During four 12–60 hour events, substantially elevated NOy were observed in air not impacted by emissions from the town of Barrow. During these four events, peak NOy concentrations of 3 to 16 ppb were observed. Other data, including NO, SO2, SO4, and meteorology, were used to help identify the source region for the elevated NOy levels. These data present a consistent picture which indicates…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elevated NOx, NOy, CH4, and CO2 have been observed at Utqiaġvik, downwind of the oil fields.
“Elevated NO x , NO y , CH4, and CO2 have been observed at Utqia ġ vik, downwind of the oil fi elds (Jaffe et al., 1991, 1995).”
From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Jaffe et al., 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem
Schmale, J., Arnold, S. R., Law, K. S., Thorp, T., Anenberg, S., Simpson, W. R., Mao, J., & Pratt, K. A. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2018ef000952 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“Elevated NOx, NOy, CH4, and CO2 have been observed at Utqiaġvik, downwind of the oil fields (Jaffe et al., 1991, 1995).”
Background
- Authors
- Jaffe, D. A., Honrath, R. E., Herring, J. A., Li, S. ‐., & Kahl, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1991-04-20
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- D4
- Pages
- 7395-7405
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068016008
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Keywords
- nitrogen oxides, Arctic haze, long-range pollutant transport, industrial emissions, backward trajectory analysis, Barrow, Alaska
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review