Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of nitrogen additions on annual nitrous oxide fluxes from temperate forest soils in the northeastern United States

Bowden, Richard D., Melillo, Jerry M., Steudler, Paul A., Aber, John D.·1991·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes between aerobic soils and the atmosphere were measured each month for 2 years (except during the period of snow cover) in control and N‐fertilized plots in a red pine plantation and a mixed hardwood forest in the northeastern United States. Nitrogen was added as NH 4 NO 3; application rates were 0 (control), 37 (low‐N), and 120 (high‐N) kg N/ha/yr in year 1. In year 2, application rates were 0 (control), 50 (low‐N), and 150 (high‐N) kg N/ha/yr. A total of 2520 individual flux measurements were made over the 2 years. Mean emission rates (μg N/m 2/h) from the control plots were low (pine: year 1 = 0.17, year 2 = 1.10; hardwood: year 1 = 0.27, year 2 = 0.29). Fertilization resulted in only small increases in N 2 O effluxes even in the second year, with low rates in the low‐N plots (pine: year 1 = 2.19, year 2 = 3.87; hardwood: year 1 = 1.16, year 2 = 0.77) and also in the high‐N plots (pine: year 1 = 0.71, year 2 = 5.24; hardwood: year 1 = 1.12, year 2 = 0.90). The maximum N 2 O loss was 0.350 kg N/ha/yr from the red pine high‐N plot. Weak seasonal flux trends were noted in both stands, with highest efflux rates in spring and mid to late summer. No statistically significant relationships between fluxes and soil temperatures, soil moisture, or soil NO 3− or NH 4+ were detected. Low rates of net nitrification in both the control plots and the fertilized plots are thought to be responsible for the low N 2 O emissions. Small increases in net nitrification were measured in the forest floor of the the pine stand, with rates in the control, low‐N, and high‐N plots of 1.5, 4.5, and 8.5 kg N/ha/yr, respectively. Net nitrification rates in the hardwood plots were 0.1, 0.9, and 0.6 kg N/ha/yr in the control, low‐N, and high‐N plots, respectively. Low NH 4+ availability in the forest floor and low NH 4+ concentrations in soil solution below the rooting zone (0.5–0.7 m) suggest that NH 4+ availability for nitrification is limited by competition with plant uptake and microbial immobilization, and that this competition is not alleviated by 2 years (50–150 kg N/ha/yr) of N addition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91jd00151

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Bowden, R. D., Melillo, J. M., Steudler, P. A., & Aber, J. D.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1991-05-20
Volume
96
Issue
D5
Pages
9321-9328
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158885648
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of nitrogen additions on annual nitrous oxide fluxes from temperate forest soils in the northeastern United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jd00151
The paper
Bowden, R. D., Melillo, J. M., Steudler, P. A., & Aber, J. D. (1991). Effects of nitrogen additions on annual nitrous oxide fluxes from temperate forest soils in the northeastern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jd00151

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.