The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three‐dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle
Open accessAbstract
The geographic and seasonal emission distributions of the major sources and sinks of atmospheric methane were compiled using methane flux measurements and energy and agricultural statistics in conjunction with global digital data bases of land surface characteristics and anthropogenic activities. Chemical destruction of methane in the atmosphere was calculated using three‐dimensional OH fields every 5 days taken from Spivakovsky et al. (1990a, b). The signatures of each of the sources and sinks in the atmosphere were simulated using a global three‐dimensional tracer transport model. Candidate methane budget scenarios were constructed according to mass balance of methane and its carbon isotopes. The verisimilitude of the scenarios was tested by their ability to reproduce the meridional gradient and seasonal variations of methane observed in the atmosphere. Constraints imposed by all the atmospheric observations are satisfied simultaneously by several budget scenarios. A preferred budget comprises annual destruction rates of 450 Tg by OH oxidation and 10 Tg by soil absorption and annual emissions of 80 Tg from fossil sources, 80 Tg from domestic animals, and 35 Tg from wetlands and tundra poleward of 50°N. Emissions from landfills, tropical swamps, rice fields, biomass burning, and termites total 295 Tg; however, the individual contributions of these terms cannot be determined uniquely because of the lack of measurements of direct fluxes and of atmospheric methane variations in regions where these sources are concentrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
Three decades of global methane sources and sinks
Kirschke, S., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Bergamaschi, P., Bergmann, D., Blake, D. R., Bruhwiler, L., et al. (2013) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1955 · Cited by 2,247
Self-citationMethane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming
Moss, A. R., Jouany, J.-P., & Newbold, J. (2000) · Annales de Zootechnie · doi:10.1051/animres:2000119 · Cited by 1,414
Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming
Walter, K. M., Zimov, S. A., Chanton, J. P., Verbyla, D., & Chapin, F. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05040 · Cited by 1,049
Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane
LELIEVELD, J., CRUTZEN, P. J., & DENTENER, F. J. (1998) · Tellus B · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.1998.t01-1-00002.x · Cited by 733
Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane
Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., & Kort, E. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1814297116 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Fung, I., John, J., Lerner, J., Matthews, E., Prather, M., Steele, L. P., & Fraser, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1991-07-20
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- D7
- Pages
- 13033-13065
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162157043
- Cited by
- 958
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 71.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jd01247
- The paper
- Fung, I., John, J., Lerner, J., Matthews, E., Prather, M., Steele, L. P., & Fraser, P. J. (1991). Three‐dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jd01247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.