The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmosphere‐surface exchange of mercury in a forest: Results of modeling and gradient approaches
Abstract
We have modified recently published dry deposition models to estimate deposition velocities (V d) for Hg in both fine aerosol and vapor form to forest canopy surfaces. Aerosol and total vapor phase Hg concentrations in air previously measured at Walker Branch Watershed in Tennessee have been used with model results to estimate dry deposition to a deciduous forest. The concentration data confirm that airborne Hg is dominated by vapor forms at this site and exhibits concentrations moderately above continental background levels. The modeled Vd values reflect published data which suggest that dry deposition of Hg vapor is strongly controlled by surface transport processes, notably stomatal and mesophyll resistances, the latter dominating. Weekly mean Vd values ranged from 0.006 (winter) to 0.12 (summer) cm s−1. We have also measured concentration gradients of Hg vapor in air above this forest to estimate air‐surface exchange during short‐term experiments. While the model results indicate that the canopy is a sink for Hg vapor, the concentration profiles suggest that the forest soils are a source during some periods, the combined effect of which is net Hg fluxes in the upward direction. Application of a detailed canopy turbulence model yielded soil emission rates of the order of 50 ng Hg m−2 h−1, ∼10% of which is deposited in the canopy. Our modeled dry deposition estimates plus limited measurements of wet deposition in this area suggest that dry and wet deposition may be comparable in magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury: A Review
Selin, N. E. (2009) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314 · Cited by 1,354
Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review
Grigal, D. F. (2002) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a01-013 · Cited by 454
Environmental distribution and transformation of mercury compounds
Stein, E. D., Cohen, Y., & Winer, A. M. (1996) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389609388485 · Cited by 358
Plant Adaptation and Phytoremediation
(2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9370-7 · Cited by 308
Geochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindberg, S. E., Meyers, T. P., Taylor, G. E., Turner, R. R., & Schroeder, W. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-02-20
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- D2
- Pages
- 2519-2528
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046617768
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmosphere‐surface exchange of mercury in a forest: Results of modeling and gradient approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jd02831
- The paper
- Lindberg, S. E., Meyers, T. P., Taylor, G. E., Turner, R. R., & Schroeder, W. H. (1992). Atmosphere‐surface exchange of mercury in a forest: Results of modeling and gradient approaches. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jd02831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.