The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 1. Theory
Abstract
This paper presents a model of the long‐term evolution of catchments, the growth of their drainage networks, and the changes in elevations within both the channels and the hillslopes. Elevation changes are determined from continuity equations for flow and sediment transport, with sediment transport being related to discharge and slope. The central feature of the model is that it explicitly differentiates between the sediment transport behavior of the channels and the hillslopes on the basis of observed physics, and the channel network extension results solely from physically based flow interactions on the hillslopes. The difference in behavior of channels and hillslopes is one of the most important properties of a catchment. The flow and sediment transport continuity equations in the channel and the hillslope are coupled and account for the long‐term interactions of the elevations in the hillslope and in the channels. Sediment transport can be due to fluvial processes, creep, and rockslides. Tectonic uplift may increase overall catchment elevations. The dynamics of channel head advance, and thus network growth, are modeled using a physically based mechanism for channel initiation and growth where a channel head advances when a channel initiation function, nonlinearly dependent on discharge and slope, exceeds a threshold. This threshold controls the drainage density of the basin. A computer implementation of the model is introduced, some simple simulations presented, and the numerics of the solution technique described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A detachment‐limited model of drainage basin evolution
Howard, A. D. (1994) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/94wr00757 · Cited by 1,255
Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges
Montgomery, D. R., & Brandon, M. T. (2002) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00725-2 · Cited by 837
Modeling fluvial erosion on regional to continental scales
Howard, A. D., Dietrich, W. E., & Seidl, M. A. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/94jb00744 · Cited by 787
Crosby, B. T., & Whipple, K. X. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.023 · Cited by 632
The case for rainfall on a warm, wet early Mars
Craddock, R. A., & Howard, A. D. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2001je001505 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Willgoose, G., Bras, R. L., & Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1671-1684
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2075928876
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 1. Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91wr00935
- The paper
- Willgoose, G., Bras, R. L., & Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I. (1991). A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 1. Theory. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/91wr00935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.