Cited by 213Geological and Geophysical Studiesearthquake and tectonic studiesHigh-pressure geophysics and materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oceanic crustal thickness versus spreading rate

Chen, Yongshun John·1992·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

A compilation of oceanic crustal thickness from seismic observations collected over the past two decades shows that the average crustal thickness, away from plateaus, is 6 km; no systematic increase of crustal thickness with spreading rate is observed. Instead, the data show large variations in crustal thickness at slow spreading ridges (3 – 8 km for half rates < 20 mm/yr) and small variations in thickness at fast rates (5 – 7 km for half rates > 30 mm/yr). The large variations at slow ridges and small variations at fast ridges are consistent with the results inferred from recent gravity studies of mid‐ocean ridges. Both data sets support the speculation of a transition from a 3‐D structure of crustal accretion at slow ridges to a 2‐D accretion pattern at fast ridges.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/92gl00161

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Detrick R. S., Chapter VI: Crustal structure of oceanic fracture zones, in The Tectonics of Fracture Zones
  2. Jackson H. R., 1980, Crustal refraction and seismic reflection results from FRAM 1 (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 61, 276
  3. Rowlett H., 1974, An ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) refraction profile on the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge at 13°S (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU., 55, 294
  4. Abbott D., 1987, Statistics of fracture zones, subduction of ridges, and the composition of Ophiolites (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU., 69, 408
  5. Blackman D. K., Isostatic compensation of tectonic features of MAR: 25–27°30′S, J. Geophys. Res.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y. J.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Yongshun John
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
1992-04-24
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
753-756
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2092103829
Cited by
213
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
Keywords
oceanic crustal thickness, spreading rate, mid-ocean ridge, slow-spreading ridge, fast-spreading ridges, crustal accretion, gravity anomalies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review