The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutrient provinces in the sea: Concentration ratios, reaction rate ratios, and ideal covariation
Abstract
Global distributions of the ratios of the concentrations of nitrate + nitrite (= [N]) and phosphate (= [P]) are evaluated from Geochemical Ocean Sections Study (GEOSECS) and Transient Tracers in the Ocean (TTO) data sets. If large oceanic regions (or provinces) can be identified on the basis of constant [N]: [P] ratios, then the distribution equation for a reactive variable shows that the ratio of the net reaction rates involving N and P in each one is equal to its concentration ratio. Organisms within the interiors of the provinces would then be in balance with the ratios in which the nutrients are present, producing a non‐fractionated or “ideal” nutrient covariation. Such provinces can be observed throughout the ocean. Notable features are as follows: (1) Between the euphotic zone and 500 m in the west central North Atlantic is a large region in which N‐P regeneration produces very high [N]:[P] ratios: ∼50 mol mol−1. Potential causes are 18° Water formation, coccolithophorid growth, nitrogen fixation, or atmospheric fixed‐nitrogen deposition. (2) Most oligotrophic surface waters seem to have [N]:[P] between 0 and 3 mol mol−1, implying that the net removal ratio of N and P in those waters is 0–3 mol mol−1. (3) Below 600 m, the ocean contains large provinces with N‐P regeneration ratios of 12–18 mol mol−1. The dominant ratio is slightly sub‐Redfield at 14.5–15 mol mol−1, with the entire Indian Ocean below 3000 m being ideally covariant at 14.7 mol mol−1. The northeastern Pacific has provinces with very low regeneration ratios (<14 mol mol−1). Vertical boundaries between deep provinces in the western Pacific and eastern Atlantic suggest that particles from immediately above control regeneration ratios, whereas the more horizontal boundaries between western Atlantic provinces appear to reflect a greater importance of horizontally transported particles in water masses like Antarctic Intermediate Water. N‐P reaction rate ratios along deep isopycnal surfaces are quite variable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., & Smetacek, V. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.200 · Cited by 2,848
Global patterns of marine nitrogen fixation and denitrification
Gruber, N., & Sarmiento, J. L. (1997) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/97gb00077 · Cited by 1,307
Dinitrogen fixation in the world's oceans
Karl, D., Michaels, A., Bergman, B., Capone, D., Carpenter, E., Letelier, R., Lipschultz, F., Paerl, H., Sigman, D., & Stal, L. (2002) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1015798105851 · Cited by 695
Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study
Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., & Heip, C. H. R. (1996) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/96gb02562 · Cited by 386
Large changes in oceanic nutrient inventories from glacial to interglacial periods
Ganeshram, R. S., Pedersen, T. F., Calvert, S. E., & Murray, J. W. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376755a0 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Fanning, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-04-15
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- C4
- Pages
- 5693-5712
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167622481
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient provinces in the sea: Concentration ratios, reaction rate ratios, and ideal covariation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92jc00007
- The paper
- Fanning, K. A. (1992). Nutrient provinces in the sea: Concentration ratios, reaction rate ratios, and ideal covariation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/92jc00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.