The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physicochemical properties of aerosols over the northeast Atlantic: Evidence for wind‐speed‐related submicron sea‐salt aerosol production
Abstract
Physicochemical characteristics of submicron aerosol particles over the Northeast Atlantic (63°N, 8°W) during October/November 1989 have been examined using a thermal analytical technique and are classified according to air mass origin. Aerosol associated with anthropogenically influenced air masses contained typically 80% sulphate particles by number, the remainder being soot carbon and sea salt. For Arctic air masses the contribution of sulphate to the total aerosol was reduced to around 65%, due to low concentrations relative to sea salt which is dependent on wind speed. In situations with clean maritime air and high wind speeds, sulphate aerosol accounted for less than 25% of the total accumulation mode particles, the remainder consisting predominantly of sea salt. Arctic air masses and clean maritime air during periods of high winds were consistently acidic with inferred molar ratios of NH 4+/SO 4= near 0.2. The continental and modified maritime aerosol encountered was found to have molar ratios of about 0.8. Soot carbon was present in all air masses to a similar degree (5–13%). In clean air masses, submicron sea salt aerosol concentrations showed a strong exponential increase with wind speed (correlation coefficients cc ≥ 0.8), down to a dry particle radius of 0.05 μm. Under these “clean air” conditions and high winds the sea salt aerosol dominated all particle sizes for r > 0.05 μm and accounted for approximately 75% of the total concentration, suggesting that under these conditions, sea salt aerosol would comprise the primary source of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) in stratiform clouds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., & Warren, S. G. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326655a0 · Cited by 4,305
Cited by
The case against climate regulation via oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions
Quinn, P. K., & Bates, T. S. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10580 · Cited by 704
Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods, Measurements and Models—A Critical Review
Lewis, R., & Schwartz, E. (2004) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/gm152 · Cited by 658
Marine aerosol, sea-salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: a short review
O'Dowd, C. D., Smith, M. H., Consterdine, I. E., & Lowe, J. A. (1997) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(96)00106-9 · Cited by 649
Self-citationRadiative effects of natural aerosols: A review
SATHEESH, S., & KRISHNAMOORTHY, K. (2005) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.029 · Cited by 553
Atmospheric processing of organic aerosols
Ellison, G. B., Tuck, A. F., & Vaida, V. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd900073 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Dowd, C. D., & Smith, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1993-01-20
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- 1137-1149
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126210823
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physicochemical properties of aerosols over the northeast Atlantic: Evidence for wind‐speed‐related submicron sea‐salt aerosol production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92jd02302
- The paper
- O'Dowd, C. D., & Smith, M. H. (1993). Physicochemical properties of aerosols over the northeast Atlantic: Evidence for wind‐speed‐related submicron sea‐salt aerosol production. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/92jd02302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.