The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithms for solving Richards' equation for variably saturated soils
Abstract
Previous work has shown that a one‐dimensional water content‐based finite difference algorithm can offer improved CPU efficiency in modeling infiltration into very dry heterogeneous soil when compared to similar pressure‐based algorithms. The usefulness of the water content‐based method is limited, however, since it cannot be applied to saturated soils. In this paper we develop two new methods which retain the advantages of water content‐based methods while still permitting fully saturated conditions. In the first method we define a new variable for the transformed Richards equation which has the characteristics of water content when soil is unsaturated and of pressure when soil is at or near saturation. In addition to the transformed Richards' equation method, an improved pressure‐based method which uses flux updating is presented. Both methods are implemented in algorithms using a preconditioned conjugate gradient method equation solver. The performance of the algorithms is compared to that of an algorithm based on a mixed form of Richards' equation using modified Picard iteration. Two test cases are examined. The first test case examines two‐dimensional infiltration into very dry heterogeneous soil which remains unsaturated throughout the simulation period. The second test case examines a two‐dimensional developing perched water table. Results indicate that the new methods retain the advantages of the water content‐based method for fully unsaturated heterogeneous problems while allowing for fully saturated conditions. For the unsaturated problem the new algorithms were from 16 to 59 times faster than the algorithm based on the mixed form of Richards' equation using modified Picard iteration. For the saturated problem the new algorithms were from 6 to 25 times faster than the mixed base algorithm. Results also indicate that the performance of the mixed base algorithm could be significantly improved if a more effective adaptive time step were developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
Cited by
Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook
Paniconi, C., & Putti, M. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017780 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkland, M. R., Hills, R. G., & Wierenga, P. J.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2049-2058
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2137195075
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Algorithms for solving Richards' equation for variably saturated soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92wr00802
- The paper
- Kirkland, M. R., Hills, R. G., & Wierenga, P. J. (1992). Algorithms for solving Richards' equation for variably saturated soils. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/92wr00802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.