The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oceanic 13C/12C observations: A new window on ocean CO2 uptake
Abstract
Equations are developed describing the rate of change of carbon isotopic ratios in the atmosphere and oceans in terms of δ 13 C quantities. The equations enable one to perform calculations directly with δ and ϵ quantities commonly reported in the literature. The main cause of the change occurring today is the combustion of fossil fuel carbon with lower δ 13 C values. The course of this isotopic anomaly in atmosphere and oceans can provide new constraints on the carbon budgets of these reservoirs. Recently published δ 13 C isotopic data of total inorganic carbon in the oceans [Quay et al., 1992] appear to lead to incompatible results with respect to the uptake of fossil fuel CO 2 by the oceans if two different approaches to the data are taken. Consideration of the air‐sea isotopic disequilibrium leads to an uptake estimate of only a few tenths of a gigaton C (Gt, for 10 15 g) per year, whereas the apparent change in the ocean δ 13 C inventory leads to an estimate of more than 2 Gt C yr−1. Both results are very uncertain with presently available data. The isotopic ratio has the advantage that the signal‐to‐noise ratio for the measurement of the uptake of the isotopic signal by the oceans is better than for the uptake of total carbon, The drawback is that isotopic exchange with carbon reservoirs that are difficult to characterize introduces uncertainty into the isotopic budget. The accuracy requirements for the measurements are high, demanding careful standardization at all stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., Holland, E. A., McKeown, R., Ojima, D. S., Painter, T. H., Parton, W. J., & Townsend, A. R. (1994) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb00993 · Cited by 1,060
Carbon isotope fractionation during gas–water exchange and dissolution of CO2
Zhang, J., Quay, P. D., & Wilbur, D. O. (1995) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(95)91550-d · Cited by 863
Spatiotemporal patterns of carbon‐13 in the global surface oceans and the oceanic suess effect
Gruber, N., Keeling, C. D., Bacastow, R. B., Guenther, P. R., Lueker, T. J., Wahlen, M., Meijer, H. A. J., Mook, W. G., & Stocker, T. F. (1999) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb900019 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Tans, P. P., Berry, J. A., & Keeling, R. F.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 353-368
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2001442432
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oceanic 13C/12C observations: A new window on ocean CO2 uptake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93gb00053
- The paper
- Tans, P. P., Berry, J. A., & Keeling, R. F. (1993). Oceanic 13C/12C observations: A new window on ocean CO2 uptake. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/93gb00053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.