Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A gravity model for the Sudbury Structure along the Lithoprobe seismic line

McGrath, P. H., Broome, H. J.·1994·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Previous gravity models of the Sudbury Structure (1850 Ma) were constrained by surface geology, and by density measurements of surface and borehole rock samples. Recent high‐resolution seismic reflection data provide additional constraints for modeling new gravity observations made along the Sudbury Lithoprobe transect. Results indicate, 1) density distributions constrained by the seismic data yield calculated gravity values matching the Bouguer gravity data, 2) the main sources of gravitational disturbance are external to the Sudbury Structure, 3) the positive gravity anomaly trend south of the Sudbury Structure is associated with mafic rocks of Proterozoic age, and 4) the large, ramplike, gravity anomaly paralleling the northwest margin of the Sudbury Structure is an expression of a northward dipping boundary within the Archean basement. The presence of a hidden mafic layer beneath the Sudbury Structure is not required to model the Bouguer gravity data. An enigma is an 8 mGal, positive, gravity anomaly over the south central Sudbury Structure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/93gl02247

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1190/1.1440410 · DOI
  2. Card K. D., 1984, The Sudbury Structure: Its regional geological and geophysical setting, Ontario Geological Survey, 1, 57
  3. Dressler B. O., 1984, General geology of the Sudbury area, Ontario Geological Survey, 1, 57
  4. Gupta V. K., 1984, Gravity and magnetic characteristics of lie Sudbury Structure, Ontario Geological Survey, 1, 381
  5. Hearst R. B.P. H.McGrathH. J.BroomeW. A.MorrisM. D.ThomasE. I.TanczykP.KeatingD. W.Haliday Gravity and magnetic interpretation along the LITHOPROBE transect of the Sudbury Structure Workshop Report 25 Abitibi‐Grenville Transect Meeting Montreal Nov. 19–20 1991
  6. McGrath P. H., Sudbury‐Noril'sk Symposium Proceedings
  7. McGrath P. H. MAGRAV ‐ An interactive gravity and magnetic modelling program for the UNIX environment Geological Survey of Canada Open File 2711a 1993 · DOI
  8. 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0807:DGOTSS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  9. Miller A. H., 1955, Gravity in the Sudbury Basin and vicinity, Publ. Dom. Obs. Canada, 15
  10. Popelar J., 1971, Gravity measurements in the Sudbury area, Gravity Map Series, Earth Physics Branch, 138
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb00994.x · DOI
  12. Rousell D. H., 1984, Structural geology of the Sudbury Basin, Ontario Geological Survey, 1, 83
  13. 10.1139/e91-037 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/0098-3004(76)90071-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McGrath, P. H., & Broome, H. J.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
1994-05-15
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
955-958
ISSN
  • 0094-8276
  • 1944-8007
Cited by
19
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review