Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A geodynamic model of mantle density heterogeneity

Open access
Ricard, Yanick, Richards, Mark, Lithgow‐Bertelloni, Carolina, Le Stunff, Yves·1993·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Using Cenozoic and Mesozoic plate motion reconstructions, we derive a model of present‐day mantle density heterogeneity under the assumption that subducted slabs sink vertically into the mantle. The thermal buoyancy of these slabs is estimated from the observed thermal subsidence (cooling) of oceanic lithosphere. Slab velocities in the upper mantle are computed from the local convergence rate. We assume that slabs cross the upper/lower mantle interface and continue sinking into the lower mantle with a reduced velocity. For a velocity reduction factor between 2 and 5, our slab heterogeneity model is as correlated with current tomographic models as these models are correlated with each other. We have also computed a synthetic geoid from our density model. For a viscosity increase of about a factor of 40 from the upper to lower mantle, our model predicts the first 8 spherical harmonic degrees of the geoid with statistical confidence larger than 95% and explains 84% of the observed geoid assuming that the model C21 and S21 terms are absent due to a long relaxation time for Earth's rotational bulge. Otherwise, 73% of the geoid variance is explained. The viscosity increase is consistent with our velocity reduction factor for slabs entering the lower mantle, since downwelling velocities are expected to scale roughly as the logarithm of viscosity (loge 40 = 3.7). These results show that the history of plate tectonics can explain the main features of the present‐day structure of the mantle. The dynamic topography induced by this heterogeneity structure consists mainly of about 1‐km amplitude lows concentrated along the active continental margins of the Pacific basin. Our model can also be used to predict the time variation of mantle heterogeneity and the gravity field. We find that the “age” of the geoid, defined as the time in the past before which the geoid becomes uncorrelated with the present geoid, is about 50 m.y. Our model for the history of the degree 2 geoid, which is equivalent to the history of the inertia tensor, should give us a tool to study the variations in Earth's rotation pole indicated in paleomagiietic studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/93jb02216

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Ricard, Y., Richards, M., Lithgow‐Bertelloni, C., & Le Stunff, Y.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1993-12-10
Volume
98
Issue
B12
Pages
21895-21909
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071118545
Cited by
466
References
51
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A geodynamic model of mantle density heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jb02216
The paper
Ricard, Y., Richards, M., Lithgow‐Bertelloni, C., & Le Stunff, Y. (1993). A geodynamic model of mantle density heterogeneity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jb02216

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.